Land Rover Range Rover Sport 2009 vs Land Rover Range Rover Sport 2005
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 3.0 Diesel | 2.7 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain and belt | Timing chain and belt | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 245 HP | 190 HP | |
| Torque: | 600 NM | 440 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.3 seconds | 12.7 seconds | |
|
Land Rover Range Rover Sport 2009 is more dynamic to drive. Land Rover Range Rover Sport 2009 engine produces 55 HP more power than Land Rover Range Rover Sport 2005, whereas torque is 160 NM more than Land Rover Range Rover Sport 2005. Thanks to more power Land Rover Range Rover Sport 2009 reaches 100 km/h speed 3.4 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 9.2 | 10.2 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 12.1 l/100km | 11.0 l/100km | |
|
The Land Rover Range Rover Sport 2005 is a better choice in terms of fuel economy based on user-reported consumption, although the specification shows otherwise. By specification Land Rover Range Rover Sport 2009 consumes 1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Land Rover Range Rover Sport 2005, which means that by driving the Land Rover Range Rover Sport 2009 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 150 litres of fuel. But when we compare the real fuel consumption reported by users, Land Rover Range Rover Sport 2009 consumes 1.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Land Rover Range Rover Sport 2005. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 84 litres | 82 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 910 km in combined cycle | 800 km in combined cycle | |
| 690 km with real consumption | 740 km with real consumption | ||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
| Ground clearance: | 227 mm (8.9 inches) | 227 mm (8.9 inches) | |
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 420'000 km | 330'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Land Rover Range Rover Sport 2009 engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 17 years | 6 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 3 other car models, including Land Rover Range Rover, Land Rover Discovery | Used also on Land Rover Discovery | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Land Rover Range Rover Sport 2009 might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.79 m | 4.79 m | |
| Width: | 2.00 m | 1.93 m | |
| Height: | 1.78 m | 1.78 m | |
| Land Rover Range Rover Sport 2009 and Land Rover Range Rover Sport 2005 are practically the same length. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 958 litres | 958 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
2013 litres | 2013 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 11.9 meters | 11.6 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Land Rover Range Rover Sport 2009 is 0.3 metres more than that of the Land Rover Range Rover Sport 2005. | |||
| Power steering: | Electric power steering | Hydraulic power steering | |
| Electric power steering is simpler, quieter, more fuel-efficient, more configurable and provides additional features such as auto-steering for lane assist and parking. The disadvantages of electric power steering are possible overheating under prolonged load conditions and insufficient feedback (feeling) during steering. | |||
| Gross weight: | 3`175 kg | 3`070 kg | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 8600 | 5200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Land Rover Range Rover Sport has
|
Land Rover Range Rover Sport has
| |