Land Rover Range Rover Sport 2009 vs BMW X5 2013

 
Land Rover Range Rover Sport
2009 - 2013
BMW X5
2013 - 2013
Gearbox: AutomaticAutomatic
Engine: 3.0 Diesel3.0 Diesel
Camshaft drive: Timing chain and beltTiming chain

Performance

Power: 245 HP381 HP
Torque: 600 NM740 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 9.3 seconds5.4 seconds
BMW X5 is a more dynamic driving.
Land Rover Range Rover Sport engine produces 136 HP less power than BMW X5, whereas torque is 140 NM less than BMW X5. Due to the lower power, Land Rover Range Rover Sport reaches 100 km/h speed 3.9 seconds later.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 9.27.5
Real fuel consumption: 12.1 l/100km12.0 l/100km
The BMW X5 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy.
By specification Land Rover Range Rover Sport consumes 1.7 litres more fuel per 100 km than the BMW X5, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Land Rover Range Rover Sport could require 255 litres more fuel.
By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Land Rover Range Rover Sport consumes 0.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the BMW X5.

Drive type

Wheel drive type: All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4)All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4)

Engines

Average engine lifespan: 420'000 km300'000 km
Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Land Rover Range Rover Sport engine could be longer.
Engine production duration: 16 years17 years
Engine spread: Installed on at least 3 other car models, including Land Rover Range Rover, Land Rover DiscoveryInstalled on at least 3 other car models, including BMW 5 sērija, BMW 7 sērija, BMW X6
In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts.

Dimensions

Length: 4.78 m4.86 m
Width: 2.00 m2.01 m
Height: 1.78 m1.78 m
Both cars are similar in size. Land Rover Range Rover Sport is 7 cm shorter than the BMW X5, width is practically the same also the height of the cars does not differ significantly.
Trunk capacity: no data620 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
no data1750 litres
Turning diameter: no data12.8 meters
Gross weight (kg): 3`1752`830
Safety: no datano data
Quality: no data
average
Average price (€): 960014 000
Pros and Cons: Land Rover Range Rover Sport has
  • longer expected engine lifespan
  • lower price
BMW X5 has
  • more power
  • more dynamic
  • lower fuel consumption
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv