Land Rover Range Rover Sport 2009 vs Audi Q7 2010
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 3.0 Diesel | 3.0 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 245 HP | 204 HP | |
| Torque: | 600 NM | 450 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.3 seconds | 9.1 seconds | |
| Land Rover Range Rover Sport engine produces 41 HP more power than Audi Q7, whereas torque is 150 NM more than Audi Q7. Despite the higher power, Land Rover Range Rover Sport reaches 100 km/h speed 0.2 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 9.2 | 7.2 | |
|
The Audi Q7 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Land Rover Range Rover Sport consumes 2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Audi Q7, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Land Rover Range Rover Sport could require 300 litres more fuel. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.78 m | 5.09 m | |
| Width: | 2.00 m | 1.98 m | |
| Height: | 1.78 m | 1.74 m | |
| Land Rover Range Rover Sport is 31 cm shorter than the Audi Q7, 2 cm wider, while the height of Land Rover Range Rover Sport is 5 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 775 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 2035 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | no data | 12 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 3`175 | 2`995 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | average | |
| Average price (€): | 9600 | 15 600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Land Rover Range Rover Sport has
|
Audi Q7 has
| |