Land Rover Range Rover Sport 2014 vs Land Rover Range Rover 2012
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 5.0 Petrol | 5.0 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 550 HP | 375 HP | |
| Torque: | 680 NM | 510 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 4.7 seconds | 6.8 seconds | |
|
Land Rover Range Rover Sport is more dynamic to drive. Land Rover Range Rover Sport engine produces 175 HP more power than Land Rover Range Rover, whereas torque is 170 NM more than Land Rover Range Rover. Thanks to more power Land Rover Range Rover Sport reaches 100 km/h speed 2.1 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 13.7 | 12.8 | |
|
The Land Rover Range Rover is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Land Rover Range Rover Sport consumes 0.9 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Land Rover Range Rover, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Land Rover Range Rover Sport could require 135 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 105 litres | 105 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 760 km in combined cycle | 820 km in combined cycle | |
| 1070 km on highway | 1100 km on highway | ||
| Land Rover Range Rover gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 420'000 km | 560'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Land Rover Range Rover engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 16 years | 5 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Land Rover Range Rover, Jaguar XJ | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Land Rover Discovery, Land Rover Range Rover Sport | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Land Rover Range Rover Sport might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.87 m | 5.00 m | |
| Width: | 1.98 m | 1.98 m | |
| Height: | 1.78 m | 1.84 m | |
| Land Rover Range Rover Sport is 13 cm shorter than the Land Rover Range Rover, width is practically the same , while the height of Land Rover Range Rover Sport is 6 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 784 litres | 550 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 2030 litres | |
|
Land Rover Range Rover Sport has more luggage capacity. Even though the car is shorter, Land Rover Range Rover Sport has 234 litres more trunk space than the Land Rover Range Rover. The Land Rover Range Rover may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 12.1 meters | 12.3 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Land Rover Range Rover Sport is 0.2 metres less than that of the Land Rover Range Rover. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 3`000 | no data | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 39 000 | 47 800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Land Rover Range Rover Sport has
|
Land Rover Range Rover has
| |