Land Rover Range Rover Sport 2013 vs Mitsubishi Pajero 2014
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 5.0 Petrol | 3.0 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing belt | |
| Engine chain usually needs to be replaced less often than the timing belt, but the cost of replacing the chain is usually higher. Chain motors are considered to be more reliable, but noisier and more vibration generating. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 510 HP | 178 HP | |
| Torque: | 625 NM | 261 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 5.3 seconds | 12.6 seconds | |
|
Land Rover Range Rover Sport is more dynamic to drive. Land Rover Range Rover Sport engine produces 332 HP more power than Mitsubishi Pajero, whereas torque is 364 NM more than Mitsubishi Pajero. Thanks to more power Land Rover Range Rover Sport reaches 100 km/h speed 7.3 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 12.8 | 12.2 | |
| Land Rover Range Rover Sport consumes 0.6 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mitsubishi Pajero, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Land Rover Range Rover Sport could require 90 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 77 litres | 88 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 600 km in combined cycle | 720 km in combined cycle | |
| 790 km on highway | 880 km on highway | ||
| Mitsubishi Pajero gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 16 years | 32 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Land Rover Range Rover, Jaguar XJ | Used only for this car | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. | |||
| Hydraulic tappets: | no | yes | |
| The Mitsubishi Pajero engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.85 m | 4.90 m | |
| Width: | 2.07 m | 1.88 m | |
| Height: | 1.78 m | 1.87 m | |
| Land Rover Range Rover Sport is 5 cm shorter than the Mitsubishi Pajero, 20 cm wider, while the height of Land Rover Range Rover Sport is 9 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 784 litres | 663 litres | |
|
Land Rover Range Rover Sport has more luggage capacity. Even though the car is shorter, Land Rover Range Rover Sport has 121 litres more trunk space than the Mitsubishi Pajero. The Mitsubishi Pajero may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 12.1 meters | 11.4 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Land Rover Range Rover Sport is 0.7 metres more than that of the Mitsubishi Pajero, which means Land Rover Range Rover Sport can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 3`050 | 2`810 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 39 000 | 19 400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Land Rover Range Rover Sport has
|
Mitsubishi Pajero has
| |