Land Rover Range Rover Sport 2013 vs Jeep Grand Cherokee 2013
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 5.0 Petrol | 3.0 Diesel | |
| Petrol engines (Land Rover Range Rover Sport) are generally quieter, smoother, and better suited for short trips due to quicker warm-up times. Diesel (Jeep Grand Cherokee) engines, on the other hand, offer superior fuel efficiency and torque, making them ideal for long-distance driving and heavy loads. Read more: Petrol vs. Diesel: Fuel Economy and Key Differences. | |||
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 510 HP | 247 HP | |
| Torque: | 625 NM | 570 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 5.3 seconds | 8.2 seconds | |
|
Land Rover Range Rover Sport is more dynamic to drive. Land Rover Range Rover Sport engine produces 263 HP more power than Jeep Grand Cherokee, whereas torque is 55 NM more than Jeep Grand Cherokee. Thanks to more power Land Rover Range Rover Sport reaches 100 km/h speed 2.9 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 12.8 | 7.5 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 16.3 l/100km | 8.7 l/100km | |
|
The Jeep Grand Cherokee is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Land Rover Range Rover Sport consumes 5.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Jeep Grand Cherokee, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Land Rover Range Rover Sport could require 795 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Land Rover Range Rover Sport consumes 7.6 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Jeep Grand Cherokee. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 77 litres | 89 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 600 km in combined cycle | 1180 km in combined cycle | |
| 790 km on highway | 1360 km on highway | ||
| 470 km with real consumption | 1020 km with real consumption | ||
| Jeep Grand Cherokee gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 420'000 km | 420'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 17 years | 16 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Land Rover Range Rover, Jaguar XJ | Used also on Chrysler 300C | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Land Rover Range Rover Sport might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Hydraulic tappets: | no | yes | |
| The Jeep Grand Cherokee engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.85 m | 4.83 m | |
| Width: | 2.07 m | 1.94 m | |
| Height: | 1.78 m | 1.78 m | |
|
Land Rover Range Rover Sport is larger, but slightly lower. Land Rover Range Rover Sport is 2 cm longer than the Jeep Grand Cherokee, 13 cm wider the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 784 litres | 782 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1554 litres | |
| Land Rover Range Rover Sport has 2 litres more trunk space than the Jeep Grand Cherokee. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 12.1 meters | 11.6 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Land Rover Range Rover Sport is 0.5 metres more than that of the Jeep Grand Cherokee, which means Land Rover Range Rover Sport can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 3`050 | 2`949 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 36 400 | 23 800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Land Rover Range Rover Sport has
|
Jeep Grand Cherokee has
| |