Land Rover Range Rover Sport 2013 vs Toyota Highlander 2013
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 5.0 Petrol | 3.5 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 510 HP | 249 HP | |
| Torque: | 625 NM | 337 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 5.3 seconds | 8.7 seconds | |
|
Land Rover Range Rover Sport is more dynamic to drive. Land Rover Range Rover Sport engine produces 261 HP more power than Toyota Highlander, whereas torque is 288 NM more than Toyota Highlander. Thanks to more power Land Rover Range Rover Sport reaches 100 km/h speed 3.4 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 12.8 | 10.6 | |
|
The Toyota Highlander is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Land Rover Range Rover Sport consumes 2.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Toyota Highlander, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Land Rover Range Rover Sport could require 330 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 77 litres | 72 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 600 km in combined cycle | 670 km in combined cycle | |
| 790 km on highway | 850 km on highway | ||
| Toyota Highlander gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 16 years | 21 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Land Rover Range Rover, Jaguar XJ | Installed on at least 5 other car models, including Toyota RAV4, Lexus RX, Toyota Camry, Toyota Sienna, Lexus ES | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Toyota Highlander might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Hydraulic tappets: | no | yes | |
| The Toyota Highlander engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.85 m | 4.87 m | |
| Width: | 2.07 m | 1.93 m | |
| Height: | 1.78 m | 1.73 m | |
| Land Rover Range Rover Sport is 2 cm shorter than the Toyota Highlander, 15 cm wider, while the height of Land Rover Range Rover Sport is 5 cm higher. | |||
| Seats: | no data | 7 seats | |
| Trunk capacity: | 784 litres | 391 litres | |
| Trunk capacity with 7 seats: | no data | 391 litres | |
| Trunk capacity with 5 seats: | 784 litres | no data | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 2370 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 12.1 meters | 5.9 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Land Rover Range Rover Sport is 6.2 metres more than that of the Toyota Highlander, which means Land Rover Range Rover Sport can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 3`050 | 2`755 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 37 000 | 19 200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Land Rover Range Rover Sport has
|
Toyota Highlander has
| |