Land Rover Range Rover Sport 2013 vs Mercedes ML 2011
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 5.0 Petrol | 4.7 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 510 HP | 408 HP | |
| Torque: | 625 NM | 600 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 5.3 seconds | n/a seconds | |
| Land Rover Range Rover Sport engine produces 102 HP more power than Mercedes ML, whereas torque is 25 NM more than Mercedes ML. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 12.8 | no data | |
| Fuel tank capacity: | 77 litres | 93 litres | |
| 470 km with real consumption | 690 km with real consumption | ||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.85 m | 4.80 m | |
| Width: | 2.07 m | 1.93 m | |
| Height: | 1.78 m | 1.80 m | |
|
Land Rover Range Rover Sport is larger, but slightly lower. Land Rover Range Rover Sport is 5 cm longer than the Mercedes ML, 15 cm wider, while the height of Land Rover Range Rover Sport is 2 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 784 litres | 690 litres | |
|
Land Rover Range Rover Sport has more luggage capacity. Land Rover Range Rover Sport has 94 litres more trunk space than the Mercedes ML. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 12.1 meters | 11.8 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Land Rover Range Rover Sport is 0.3 metres more than that of the Mercedes ML. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 3`050 | 2`900 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | above average | |
| Average price (€): | 39 000 | 18 600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Land Rover Range Rover Sport has
|
Mercedes ML has
| |