Land Rover Range Rover Sport 2013 vs Infiniti FX 2012
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 5.0 Petrol | 3.0 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 510 HP | 238 HP | |
| Torque: | 625 NM | 550 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 5.3 seconds | 8.3 seconds | |
|
Land Rover Range Rover Sport is more dynamic to drive. Land Rover Range Rover Sport engine produces 272 HP more power than Infiniti FX, whereas torque is 75 NM more than Infiniti FX. Thanks to more power Land Rover Range Rover Sport reaches 100 km/h speed 3 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 12.8 | 9.0 | |
|
The Infiniti FX is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Land Rover Range Rover Sport consumes 3.8 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Infiniti FX, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Land Rover Range Rover Sport could require 570 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 77 litres | 90 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 600 km in combined cycle | 1000 km in combined cycle | |
| 790 km on highway | 1150 km on highway | ||
| Infiniti FX gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 16 years | 7 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Land Rover Range Rover, Jaguar XJ | Installed on at least 3 other car models, including Renault Laguna, Nissan Navara, Nissan Pathfinder | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. | |||
| Hydraulic tappets: | no | yes | |
| The Infiniti FX engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure. | |||
| Infiniti FX 2012 3.0 engine: The V9X engine stands out due to its unusual 65-degree V-angle. It features a lightweight cast-iron block, aluminum cylinder heads with hydraulic lifters, a variable geometry turbocharger, and a chain-driven timing ... More about Infiniti FX 2012 3.0 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.85 m | 4.87 m | |
| Width: | 2.07 m | 1.93 m | |
| Height: | 1.78 m | 1.65 m | |
| Land Rover Range Rover Sport is 2 cm shorter than the Infiniti FX, 15 cm wider, while the height of Land Rover Range Rover Sport is 13 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 784 litres | 376 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1870 litres | |
|
Land Rover Range Rover Sport has more luggage capacity. Even though the car is shorter, Land Rover Range Rover Sport has 408 litres more trunk space than the Infiniti FX. The Infiniti FX may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 12.1 meters | no data | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 3`050 | no data | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 39 000 | 15 800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Land Rover Range Rover Sport has
|
Infiniti FX has
| |