Land Rover Range Rover Sport 2013 vs Mercedes ML 2011
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 4.4 Diesel | 4.7 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 339 HP | 408 HP | |
| Torque: | 700 NM | 600 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 6.9 seconds | n/a seconds | |
| Land Rover Range Rover Sport engine produces 69 HP less power than Mercedes ML, but torque is 100 NM more than Mercedes ML. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.7 | no data | |
| Fuel tank capacity: | 105 litres | 93 litres | |
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.85 m | 4.80 m | |
| Width: | 1.98 m | 1.93 m | |
| Height: | 1.78 m | 1.80 m | |
|
Land Rover Range Rover Sport is larger, but slightly lower. Land Rover Range Rover Sport is 5 cm longer than the Mercedes ML, 6 cm wider, while the height of Land Rover Range Rover Sport is 2 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 784 litres | 690 litres | |
|
Land Rover Range Rover Sport has more luggage capacity. Land Rover Range Rover Sport has 94 litres more trunk space than the Mercedes ML. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 12.6 meters | 11.8 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Land Rover Range Rover Sport is 0.8 metres more than that of the Mercedes ML, which means Land Rover Range Rover Sport can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`398 | 2`900 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | above average | |
| Average price (€): | 39 400 | 17 600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Land Rover Range Rover Sport has
|
Mercedes ML has
| |