Land Rover Range Rover Sport 2013 vs BMW X6 2014
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 4.4 Diesel | 4.4 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 339 HP | 450 HP | |
| Torque: | 700 NM | 650 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 6.9 seconds | 4.8 seconds | |
|
BMW X6 is a more dynamic driving. Land Rover Range Rover Sport engine produces 111 HP less power than BMW X6, but torque is 50 NM more than BMW X6. Due to the lower power, Land Rover Range Rover Sport reaches 100 km/h speed 2.1 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.7 | 9.7 | |
|
The Land Rover Range Rover Sport is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Land Rover Range Rover Sport consumes 1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the BMW X6, which means that by driving the Land Rover Range Rover Sport over 15,000 km in a year you can save 150 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 105 litres | 85 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1200 km in combined cycle | 870 km in combined cycle | |
| 1380 km on highway | 1100 km on highway | ||
| Land Rover Range Rover Sport gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 560'000 km | 300'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Land Rover Range Rover Sport engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 10 years | 16 years | |
| Engine spread: | Used also on Land Rover Range Rover | Installed on at least 4 other car models, including BMW 5 sērija, BMW X5, BMW 7 sērija, BMW 6 sērija | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. BMW X6 might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.85 m | 4.91 m | |
| Width: | 1.98 m | 1.99 m | |
| Height: | 1.78 m | 1.70 m | |
|
Land Rover Range Rover Sport is smaller, but higher. Land Rover Range Rover Sport is 6 cm shorter than the BMW X6, width is practically the same , while the height of Land Rover Range Rover Sport is 8 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 784 litres | 580 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1525 litres | |
|
Land Rover Range Rover Sport has more luggage capacity. Even though the car is shorter, Land Rover Range Rover Sport has 204 litres more trunk space than the BMW X6. The BMW X6 may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 12.6 meters | 12.8 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Land Rover Range Rover Sport is 0.2 metres less than that of the BMW X6. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`398 | 2`885 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | below average | |
| Average price (€): | 39 600 | 37 200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Land Rover Range Rover Sport has
|
BMW X6 has
| |