Land Rover Range Rover Sport 2013 vs Mitsubishi Pajero 2014
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 3.0 Diesel | 3.0 Petrol | |
| Diesel (Land Rover Range Rover Sport) engines typically outperform gasoline engines in terms of fuel efficiency and low-end torque. This makes them more economical and better suited for towing or long-distance travel. However, gasoline (Mitsubishi Pajero) engines mostly are lighter, quieter, and offer better acceleration and responsiveness, especially in smaller vehicles. For more information, see the article "Diesel or Petrol: Fuel Economy and Key Differences." | |||
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain and belt | Timing belt | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 248 HP | 178 HP | |
| Torque: | 600 NM | 261 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 7.6 seconds | 12.6 seconds | |
|
Land Rover Range Rover Sport is more dynamic to drive. Land Rover Range Rover Sport engine produces 70 HP more power than Mitsubishi Pajero, whereas torque is 339 NM more than Mitsubishi Pajero. Thanks to more power Land Rover Range Rover Sport reaches 100 km/h speed 5 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.3 | 12.2 | |
|
The Land Rover Range Rover Sport is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Land Rover Range Rover Sport consumes 4.9 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Mitsubishi Pajero, which means that by driving the Land Rover Range Rover Sport over 15,000 km in a year you can save 735 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 77 litres | 88 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1050 km in combined cycle | 720 km in combined cycle | |
| 1140 km on highway | 880 km on highway | ||
| Land Rover Range Rover Sport gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 17 years | 32 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 3 other car models, including Land Rover Range Rover, Land Rover Discovery | Used only for this car | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.85 m | 4.90 m | |
| Width: | 2.07 m | 1.88 m | |
| Height: | 1.78 m | 1.87 m | |
| Land Rover Range Rover Sport is 5 cm shorter than the Mitsubishi Pajero, 20 cm wider, while the height of Land Rover Range Rover Sport is 9 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 784 litres | 663 litres | |
|
Land Rover Range Rover Sport has more luggage capacity. Even though the car is shorter, The Mitsubishi Pajero may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 12.6 meters | 11.4 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Land Rover Range Rover Sport is 1.2 metres more than that of the Mitsubishi Pajero, which means Land Rover Range Rover Sport can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight: | 3`000 kg | 2`810 kg | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 36 400 | 18 200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Land Rover Range Rover Sport has
|
Mitsubishi Pajero has
| |