Land Rover Range Rover Sport 2013 vs Mitsubishi Pajero 2006

 
Land Rover Range Rover Sport
2013 - 2017
Mitsubishi Pajero
2006 - 2009
Gearbox: AutomaticAutomatic
Engine: 3.0 Diesel3.2 Diesel

Performance

Power: 248 HP170 HP
Torque: 600 NM373 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 7.6 seconds14 seconds
Land Rover Range Rover Sport is more dynamic to drive.
Land Rover Range Rover Sport engine produces 78 HP more power than Mitsubishi Pajero, whereas torque is 227 NM more than Mitsubishi Pajero. Thanks to more power Land Rover Range Rover Sport reaches 100 km/h speed 6.4 seconds faster.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 7.310.6
The Land Rover Range Rover Sport is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy.
Land Rover Range Rover Sport consumes 3.3 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Mitsubishi Pajero, which means that by driving the Land Rover Range Rover Sport over 15,000 km in a year you can save 495 litres of fuel.
Fuel tank capacity: 77 litres90 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 1050 km in combined cycle840 km in combined cycle
1140 km on highway1120 km on highway
Land Rover Range Rover Sport gets more mileage on one fuel tank.

Drive type

Wheel drive type: All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4)All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4)

Dimensions

Length: 4.85 m4.90 m
Width: 2.07 m1.88 m
Height: 1.78 m1.87 m
Land Rover Range Rover Sport is 5 cm shorter than the Mitsubishi Pajero, 19 cm wider, while the height of Land Rover Range Rover Sport is 9 cm lower.
Trunk capacity: 784 litres215 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
no data1790 litres
Land Rover Range Rover Sport has more luggage capacity.
Even though the car is shorter, Land Rover Range Rover Sport has 569 litres more trunk space than the Mitsubishi Pajero. The Mitsubishi Pajero may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers.
Turning diameter: 12.6 meters11.4 meters
The turning circle of the Land Rover Range Rover Sport is 1.2 metres more than that of the Mitsubishi Pajero, which means Land Rover Range Rover Sport can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces.
Gross weight (kg): 3`0003`300
Safety: no datano data
Quality: no data
below average
Average price (€): 39 80011 800
Pros and Cons: Land Rover Range Rover Sport has
  • more power
  • more dynamic
  • lower fuel consumption
  • more full fuel tank mileage
  • roomier boot
Mitsubishi Pajero has
  • better manoeuvrability
  • lower price
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv