Land Rover Range Rover Sport 2013 vs Jeep Grand Cherokee 2017
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 3.0 Diesel | 3.0 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain and belt | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 258 HP | 250 HP | |
| Torque: | 600 NM | 570 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 7.6 seconds | 8.2 seconds | |
|
Land Rover Range Rover Sport is more dynamic to drive. Land Rover Range Rover Sport engine produces 8 HP more power than Jeep Grand Cherokee, whereas torque is 30 NM more than Jeep Grand Cherokee. Thanks to more power Land Rover Range Rover Sport reaches 100 km/h speed 0.6 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.3 | 7.0 | |
| Land Rover Range Rover Sport consumes 0.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Jeep Grand Cherokee, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Land Rover Range Rover Sport could require 45 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 77 litres | 93 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1050 km in combined cycle | 1320 km in combined cycle | |
| 1140 km on highway | 1450 km on highway | ||
| Jeep Grand Cherokee gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 420'000 km | 350'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Land Rover Range Rover Sport engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 17 years | 10 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 3 other car models, including Land Rover Range Rover, Land Rover Discovery | Used only for this car | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Land Rover Range Rover Sport might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.85 m | 4.82 m | |
| Width: | 2.07 m | 1.94 m | |
| Height: | 1.78 m | 1.78 m | |
|
Land Rover Range Rover Sport is larger. Land Rover Range Rover Sport is 3 cm longer than the Jeep Grand Cherokee, 13 cm wider the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 784 litres | 782 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
no data | 1554 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 12.6 meters | 11.6 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Land Rover Range Rover Sport is 1 metres more than that of the Jeep Grand Cherokee, which means Land Rover Range Rover Sport can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight: | 3`000 kg | 2`949 kg | |
| Net weight: | 2`115 kg | 2`328 kg | |
| Load capacity: | 885 kg | 621 kg | |
| Land Rover Range Rover Sport load capacity (permitted cargo and passenger weight) is par apmēram 30 procentiem more than Jeep Grand Cherokee. Therefore, Land Rover Range Rover Sport is more suitable for longer family trips or transporting heavier loads. | |||
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 21 400 | 21 000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Land Rover Range Rover Sport has
|
Jeep Grand Cherokee has
| |