Land Rover Range Rover Sport 2013 vs Toyota Highlander 2013
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 3.0 Diesel | 3.5 Petrol | |
| Diesel (Land Rover Range Rover Sport) engines typically outperform gasoline engines in terms of fuel efficiency and low-end torque. This makes them more economical and better suited for towing or long-distance travel. However, gasoline (Toyota Highlander) engines mostly are lighter, quieter, and offer better acceleration and responsiveness, especially in smaller vehicles. For more information, see the article "Diesel or Petrol: Fuel Economy and Key Differences." | |||
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain and belt | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 248 HP | 249 HP | |
| Torque: | 600 NM | 337 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 7.6 seconds | 8.7 seconds | |
|
Land Rover Range Rover Sport is more dynamic to drive. Land Rover Range Rover Sport engine produces 1 HP less power than Toyota Highlander, but torque is 263 NM more than Toyota Highlander. Despite less power, Land Rover Range Rover Sport reaches 100 km/h speed 1.1 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.3 | 10.6 | |
|
The Land Rover Range Rover Sport is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Land Rover Range Rover Sport consumes 3.3 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Toyota Highlander, which means that by driving the Land Rover Range Rover Sport over 15,000 km in a year you can save 495 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 77 litres | 72 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1050 km in combined cycle | 670 km in combined cycle | |
| 1140 km on highway | 850 km on highway | ||
| Land Rover Range Rover Sport gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 17 years | 22 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 3 other car models, including Land Rover Range Rover, Land Rover Discovery | Installed on at least 5 other car models, including Toyota RAV4, Lexus RX, Toyota Camry, Toyota Sienna, Lexus ES | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Toyota Highlander might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.85 m | 4.87 m | |
| Width: | 2.07 m | 1.93 m | |
| Height: | 1.78 m | 1.73 m | |
| Land Rover Range Rover Sport is 2 cm shorter than the Toyota Highlander, 15 cm wider, while the height of Land Rover Range Rover Sport is 5 cm higher. | |||
| Seats: | no data | 7 seats | |
| Trunk capacity: | 784 litres | 391 litres | |
| Trunk capacity with 7 seats: | no data | 391 litres | |
| Trunk capacity with 5 seats: | 784 litres | no data | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 2370 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 12.6 meters | 5.9 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Land Rover Range Rover Sport is 6.7 metres more than that of the Toyota Highlander, which means Land Rover Range Rover Sport can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 3`000 | 2`755 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 36 600 | 19 200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Land Rover Range Rover Sport has
|
Toyota Highlander has
| |