Land Rover Range Rover Sport 2013 vs Infiniti FX 2012
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 3.0 Diesel | 3.0 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain and belt | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 258 HP | 238 HP | |
| Torque: | 600 NM | 550 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 7.6 seconds | 8.3 seconds | |
|
Land Rover Range Rover Sport is more dynamic to drive. Land Rover Range Rover Sport engine produces 20 HP more power than Infiniti FX, whereas torque is 50 NM more than Infiniti FX. Thanks to more power Land Rover Range Rover Sport reaches 100 km/h speed 0.7 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.3 | 9.0 | |
|
The Land Rover Range Rover Sport is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Land Rover Range Rover Sport consumes 1.7 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Infiniti FX, which means that by driving the Land Rover Range Rover Sport over 15,000 km in a year you can save 255 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 77 litres | 90 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1050 km in combined cycle | 1000 km in combined cycle | |
| 1140 km on highway | 1150 km on highway | ||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 17 years | 7 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 3 other car models, including Land Rover Range Rover, Land Rover Discovery | Installed on at least 3 other car models, including Renault Laguna, Nissan Navara, Nissan Pathfinder | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Land Rover Range Rover Sport might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Infiniti FX 2012 3.0 engine: The V9X engine stands out due to its unusual 65-degree V-angle. It features a lightweight cast-iron block, aluminum cylinder heads with hydraulic lifters, a variable geometry turbocharger, and a chain-driven timing ... More about Infiniti FX 2012 3.0 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.85 m | 4.87 m | |
| Width: | 2.07 m | 1.93 m | |
| Height: | 1.78 m | 1.65 m | |
| Land Rover Range Rover Sport is 2 cm shorter than the Infiniti FX, 15 cm wider, while the height of Land Rover Range Rover Sport is 13 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 784 litres | 376 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
no data | 1870 litres | |
|
Land Rover Range Rover Sport has more luggage capacity. Even though the car is shorter, The Infiniti FX may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 12.6 meters | 11.2 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Land Rover Range Rover Sport is 1.4 metres more than that of the Infiniti FX, which means Land Rover Range Rover Sport can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Power steering: | Electric power steering | Hydraulic power steering | |
| Electric power steering is simpler, quieter, more fuel-efficient, more configurable and provides additional features such as auto-steering for lane assist and parking. The disadvantages of electric power steering are possible overheating under prolonged load conditions and insufficient feedback (feeling) during steering. | |||
| Gross weight: | 3`000 kg | 2`520 kg | |
| Net weight: | 2`115 kg | 2`150 kg | |
| Load capacity: | 885 kg | 370 kg | |
| Land Rover Range Rover Sport load capacity (permitted cargo and passenger weight) is par apmēram 58 procentiem more than Infiniti FX. Therefore, Land Rover Range Rover Sport is more suitable for longer family trips or transporting heavier loads. | |||
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 21 400 | 12 200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Land Rover Range Rover Sport has
|
Infiniti FX has
| |