Land Rover Range Rover Sport 2013 vs Dodge Journey 2011
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 3.0 Diesel | 2.4 Petrol | |
| Diesel (Land Rover Range Rover Sport) engines typically outperform gasoline engines in terms of fuel efficiency and low-end torque. This makes them more economical and better suited for towing or long-distance travel. However, gasoline (Dodge Journey) engines mostly are lighter, quieter, and offer better acceleration and responsiveness, especially in smaller vehicles. For more information, see the article "Diesel or Petrol: Fuel Economy and Key Differences." | |||
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain and belt | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 248 HP | 173 HP | |
| Torque: | 600 NM | 225 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 7.6 seconds | n/a seconds | |
| Land Rover Range Rover Sport engine produces 75 HP more power than Dodge Journey, whereas torque is 375 NM more than Dodge Journey. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.3 | 11.2 | |
|
The Land Rover Range Rover Sport is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Land Rover Range Rover Sport consumes 3.9 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Dodge Journey, which means that by driving the Land Rover Range Rover Sport over 15,000 km in a year you can save 585 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 77 litres | 77 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1050 km in combined cycle | 680 km in combined cycle | |
| 1140 km on highway | 810 km on highway | ||
| Land Rover Range Rover Sport gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | Front wheel drive (FWD) | |
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 420'000 km | 360'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Land Rover Range Rover Sport engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 17 years | 20 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 3 other car models, including Land Rover Range Rover, Land Rover Discovery | Installed on at least 6 other car models, including Jeep Patriot, Dodge Caliber, Dodge Avenger, Chrysler Sebring, Jeep Compass | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Dodge Journey might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Hydraulic tappets: | yes | no | |
| The Land Rover Range Rover Sport engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.85 m | 4.89 m | |
| Width: | 2.07 m | 1.84 m | |
| Height: | 1.78 m | 1.69 m | |
| Land Rover Range Rover Sport is 4 cm shorter than the Dodge Journey, 24 cm wider, while the height of Land Rover Range Rover Sport is 9 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 784 litres | 300 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
no data | 1915 litres | |
|
Land Rover Range Rover Sport has more luggage capacity. Even though the car is shorter, The Dodge Journey may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 12.6 meters | 11.7 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Land Rover Range Rover Sport is 0.9 metres more than that of the Dodge Journey, which means Land Rover Range Rover Sport can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight: | 3`000 kg | 2`381 kg | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 36 400 | 10 600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Land Rover Range Rover Sport has
|
Dodge Journey has
| |