Land Rover Range Rover Sport 2013 vs BMW X6 2012
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 3.0 Diesel | 3.0 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain and belt | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 248 HP | 258 HP | |
| Torque: | 600 NM | 560 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 7.6 seconds | 6.7 seconds | |
|
BMW X6 is a more dynamic driving. Land Rover Range Rover Sport engine produces 10 HP less power than BMW X6, but torque is 40 NM more than BMW X6. Due to the lower power, Land Rover Range Rover Sport reaches 100 km/h speed 0.9 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.3 | 6.0 | |
|
The BMW X6 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Land Rover Range Rover Sport consumes 1.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than the BMW X6, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Land Rover Range Rover Sport could require 195 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 77 litres | 85 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1050 km in combined cycle | 1410 km in combined cycle | |
| 1140 km on highway | 1540 km on highway | ||
| BMW X6 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 420'000 km | 420'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 17 years | 18 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 3 other car models, including Land Rover Range Rover, Land Rover Discovery | Installed on at least 6 other car models, including BMW 5 sērija, BMW 3 sērija, BMW 7 sērija, BMW X3 | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. BMW X6 might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| BMW X6 2012 3.0 engine: The N57 engine is a robust turbo diesel unit without any major systemic issues. Its longevity depends heavily on regular maintenance, including timely servicing, periodic cleaning of the intake system, and active regeneration of the diesel particulate filter.
The ... More about BMW X6 2012 3.0 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.85 m | 4.91 m | |
| Width: | 2.07 m | 1.99 m | |
| Height: | 1.78 m | 1.70 m | |
| Land Rover Range Rover Sport is 6 cm shorter than the BMW X6, 8 cm wider, while the height of Land Rover Range Rover Sport is 8 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 784 litres | 580 litres | |
|
Land Rover Range Rover Sport has more luggage capacity. Even though the car is shorter, Land Rover Range Rover Sport has 204 litres more trunk space than the BMW X6. The BMW X6 may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 12.6 meters | 12.8 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Land Rover Range Rover Sport is 0.2 metres less than that of the BMW X6. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 3`000 | 2`780 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | average | |
| Average price (€): | 36 600 | 16 200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Land Rover Range Rover Sport has
|
BMW X6 has
| |