Land Rover Range Rover Sport 2013 vs BMW X5 2013
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 3.0 Diesel | 3.0 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain and belt | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 248 HP | 313 HP | |
| Torque: | 600 NM | 630 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 7.6 seconds | 5.9 seconds | |
|
BMW X5 is a more dynamic driving. Land Rover Range Rover Sport engine produces 65 HP less power than BMW X5, whereas torque is 30 NM less than BMW X5. Due to the lower power, Land Rover Range Rover Sport reaches 100 km/h speed 1.7 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.3 | 6.2 | |
|
The BMW X5 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Land Rover Range Rover Sport consumes 1.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the BMW X5, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Land Rover Range Rover Sport could require 165 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 77 litres | 85 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1050 km in combined cycle | 1370 km in combined cycle | |
| 1140 km on highway | 1460 km on highway | ||
| BMW X5 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 420'000 km | 350'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Land Rover Range Rover Sport engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 16 years | 17 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 3 other car models, including Land Rover Range Rover, Land Rover Discovery | Installed on at least 8 other car models, including BMW 5 sērija, BMW 3 sērija, BMW 7 sērija, BMW X3, BMW X6 | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. BMW X5 might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.85 m | 4.89 m | |
| Width: | 2.07 m | 1.94 m | |
| Height: | 1.78 m | 1.76 m | |
| Land Rover Range Rover Sport is 4 cm shorter than the BMW X5, 14 cm wider, while the height of Land Rover Range Rover Sport is 2 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 784 litres | 650 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1870 litres | |
|
Land Rover Range Rover Sport has more luggage capacity. Even though the car is shorter, Land Rover Range Rover Sport has 134 litres more trunk space than the BMW X5. The BMW X5 may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 12.6 meters | 12.7 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Land Rover Range Rover Sport is 0.1 metres less than that of the BMW X5. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 3`000 | 2`820 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | below average | |
| Average price (€): | 39 000 | 27 200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Land Rover Range Rover Sport has
|
BMW X5 has
| |