Land Rover Range Rover Sport 2013 vs Toyota Land Cruiser 2017
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 3.0 Diesel | 2.8 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain and belt | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 292 HP | 177 HP | |
| Torque: | 600 NM | 450 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 7.2 seconds | 12.7 seconds | |
|
Land Rover Range Rover Sport is more dynamic to drive. Land Rover Range Rover Sport engine produces 115 HP more power than Toyota Land Cruiser, whereas torque is 150 NM more than Toyota Land Cruiser. Thanks to more power Land Rover Range Rover Sport reaches 100 km/h speed 5.5 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.5 | 7.4 | |
| Land Rover Range Rover Sport consumes 0.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Toyota Land Cruiser, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Land Rover Range Rover Sport could require 15 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 77 litres | 87 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1020 km in combined cycle | 1170 km in combined cycle | |
| 1130 km on highway | 1380 km on highway | ||
| Toyota Land Cruiser gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 420'000 km | 350'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Land Rover Range Rover Sport engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 15 years | 9 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 3 other car models, including Land Rover Range Rover, Land Rover Discovery | Used also on Toyota Hilux | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Land Rover Range Rover Sport might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.85 m | 4.84 m | |
| Width: | 2.07 m | 1.86 m | |
| Height: | 1.78 m | 1.85 m | |
|
Land Rover Range Rover Sport is larger, but lower. Land Rover Range Rover Sport is 1 cm longer than the Toyota Land Cruiser, 22 cm wider, while the height of Land Rover Range Rover Sport is 7 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 784 litres | 621 litres | |
|
Land Rover Range Rover Sport has more luggage capacity. Land Rover Range Rover Sport has 163 litres more trunk space than the Toyota Land Cruiser. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 12.1 meters | 11.6 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Land Rover Range Rover Sport is 0.5 metres more than that of the Toyota Land Cruiser, which means Land Rover Range Rover Sport can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 3`000 | 2`990 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 39 600 | 54 000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Land Rover Range Rover Sport has
|
Toyota Land Cruiser has
| |