Land Rover Range Rover Sport 2013 vs Nissan Murano 2011
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 3.0 Diesel | 2.5 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain and belt | Double-row timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 292 HP | 190 HP | |
| Torque: | 600 NM | 450 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 7.2 seconds | 10.5 seconds | |
|
Land Rover Range Rover Sport is more dynamic to drive. Land Rover Range Rover Sport engine produces 102 HP more power than Nissan Murano, whereas torque is 150 NM more than Nissan Murano. Thanks to more power Land Rover Range Rover Sport reaches 100 km/h speed 3.3 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.5 | 8.0 | |
|
The Land Rover Range Rover Sport is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Land Rover Range Rover Sport consumes 0.5 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Nissan Murano, which means that by driving the Land Rover Range Rover Sport over 15,000 km in a year you can save 75 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 77 litres | 82 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1020 km in combined cycle | 1020 km in combined cycle | |
| 1130 km on highway | 1200 km on highway | ||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | Front wheel drive (FWD) | |
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 420'000 km | 440'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 16 years | 27 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 3 other car models, including Land Rover Range Rover, Land Rover Discovery | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Nissan Navara, Nissan Pathfinder | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. | |||
| Hydraulic tappets: | yes | no | |
| The Land Rover Range Rover Sport engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.85 m | 4.86 m | |
| Width: | 2.07 m | 1.89 m | |
| Height: | 1.78 m | 1.72 m | |
| Land Rover Range Rover Sport is 1 cm shorter than the Nissan Murano, 19 cm wider, while the height of Land Rover Range Rover Sport is 6 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 784 litres | 402 litres | |
|
Land Rover Range Rover Sport has more luggage capacity. Even though the car is shorter, Land Rover Range Rover Sport has 382 litres more trunk space than the Nissan Murano. The Nissan Murano may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 12.1 meters | 11.8 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Land Rover Range Rover Sport is 0.3 metres more than that of the Nissan Murano. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 3`000 | 2`495 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 39 000 | 8600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Land Rover Range Rover Sport has
|
Nissan Murano has
| |