Land Rover Range Rover Sport 2013 vs Land Rover Range Rover 2013
Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
---|---|---|---|
Engine: | 3.0 Petrol | 3.0 Diesel | |
Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain and belt | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 340 HP | 258 HP | |
Torque: | 450 NM | 600 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 7.2 seconds | 7.9 seconds | |
Land Rover Range Rover Sport is more dynamic to drive. Land Rover Range Rover Sport engine produces 82 HP more power than Land Rover Range Rover, but torque is 150 NM less than Land Rover Range Rover. Thanks to more power Land Rover Range Rover Sport reaches 100 km/h speed 0.7 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | no data | 7.5 | |
Fuel tank capacity: | 105 litres | 85 litres | |
Drive type | |||
Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Engines | |||
Average engine lifespan: | 390'000 km | 420'000 km | |
Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used. | |||
Engine production duration: | 12 years | 15 years | |
Engine spread: | Installed on at least 3 other car models, including Land Rover Range Rover, Land Rover Discovery | Installed on at least 3 other car models, including Land Rover Discovery, Land Rover Range Rover Sport | |
In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Land Rover Range Rover might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Hydraulic tappets: | no | yes | |
The Land Rover Range Rover engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure. | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.85 m | 5.00 m | |
Width: | 1.98 m | 2.07 m | |
Height: | 1.78 m | 1.84 m | |
Land Rover Range Rover Sport is smaller. Land Rover Range Rover Sport is 15 cm shorter than the Land Rover Range Rover, 9 cm narrower, while the height of Land Rover Range Rover Sport is 6 cm lower. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 784 litres | 550 litres | |
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 2030 litres | |
Land Rover Range Rover Sport has more luggage capacity. Even though the car is shorter, Land Rover Range Rover Sport has 234 litres more trunk space than the Land Rover Range Rover. The Land Rover Range Rover may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. | |||
Turning diameter: | 12.6 meters | 12.3 meters | |
The turning circle of the Land Rover Range Rover Sport is 0.3 metres more than that of the Land Rover Range Rover. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | 2`144 | 3`000 | |
Safety: | no data | ||
Quality: | no data | no data | |
Average price (€): | 39 600 | 50 200 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Land Rover Range Rover Sport has
|
Land Rover Range Rover has
| |