Land Rover Range Rover Sport 2013 vs BMW X6 2014
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 3.0 Petrol | 3.0 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 340 HP | 306 HP | |
| Torque: | 450 NM | 400 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 7.2 seconds | 6.4 seconds | |
| Land Rover Range Rover Sport engine produces 34 HP more power than BMW X6, whereas torque is 50 NM more than BMW X6. Despite the higher power, Land Rover Range Rover Sport reaches 100 km/h speed 0.8 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | no data | 8.6 | |
| Fuel tank capacity: | 105 litres | 85 litres | |
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 390'000 km | 420'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 12 years | 9 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 3 other car models, including Land Rover Range Rover, Land Rover Discovery | Installed on at least 7 other car models, including BMW 5 sērija, BMW 3 sērija, BMW X5, BMW 1 sērija, BMW X3 | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. | |||
| Hydraulic tappets: | no | yes | |
| The BMW X6 engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.85 m | 4.91 m | |
| Width: | 1.98 m | 1.99 m | |
| Height: | 1.78 m | 1.70 m | |
|
Land Rover Range Rover Sport is smaller, but higher. Land Rover Range Rover Sport is 6 cm shorter than the BMW X6, width is practically the same , while the height of Land Rover Range Rover Sport is 8 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 784 litres | 580 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1525 litres | |
|
Land Rover Range Rover Sport has more luggage capacity. Even though the car is shorter, Land Rover Range Rover Sport has 204 litres more trunk space than the BMW X6. The BMW X6 may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 12.6 meters | 12.8 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Land Rover Range Rover Sport is 0.2 metres less than that of the BMW X6. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`144 | 2`740 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | below average | |
| Average price (€): | 39 600 | 37 200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Land Rover Range Rover Sport has
|
BMW X6 has
| |