Land Rover Range Rover Sport 2013 vs BMW X5 2010
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 3.0 Petrol | 3.0 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 340 HP | 306 HP | |
| Torque: | 450 NM | 400 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 7.2 seconds | 6.8 seconds | |
| Land Rover Range Rover Sport engine produces 34 HP more power than BMW X5, whereas torque is 50 NM more than BMW X5. Despite the higher power, Land Rover Range Rover Sport reaches 100 km/h speed 0.4 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | no data | 10.1 | |
| Fuel tank capacity: | 105 litres | 85 litres | |
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 390'000 km | 420'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 13 years | 9 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 3 other car models, including Land Rover Range Rover, Land Rover Discovery | Installed on at least 7 other car models, including BMW 5 sērija, BMW 3 sērija, BMW 1 sērija, BMW X3, BMW X6 | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. | |||
| Hydraulic tappets: | no | yes | |
| The BMW X5 engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure. | |||
| BMW X5 2010 3.0 engine: Using poor quality oil on this engine will quickly lead to soot build-up, resulting in damage to the hydrocompensators, Vanos and Valvetronic systems. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.85 m | 4.86 m | |
| Width: | 1.98 m | 1.93 m | |
| Height: | 1.78 m | 1.78 m | |
| Land Rover Range Rover Sport and BMW X5 are practically the same length. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 784 litres | 620 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1750 litres | |
|
Land Rover Range Rover Sport has more luggage capacity. Land Rover Range Rover Sport has 164 litres more trunk space than the BMW X5. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 12.6 meters | 12.8 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Land Rover Range Rover Sport is 0.2 metres less than that of the BMW X5. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`144 | 2`750 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | average | |
| Average price (€): | 37 200 | 13 200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Land Rover Range Rover Sport has
|
BMW X5 has
| |