Land Rover Range Rover Sport 2019 vs BMW X6 2019
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 3.0 Petrol | 3.0 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 400 HP | 340 HP | |
| Torque: | 550 NM | 450 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 5.9 seconds | 5.5 seconds | |
| Land Rover Range Rover Sport engine produces 60 HP more power than BMW X6, whereas torque is 100 NM more than BMW X6. Despite the higher power, Land Rover Range Rover Sport reaches 100 km/h speed 0.4 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 11.7 | 8.6 | |
|
The BMW X6 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Land Rover Range Rover Sport consumes 3.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the BMW X6, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Land Rover Range Rover Sport could require 465 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 104 litres | 83 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 880 km in combined cycle | 960 km in combined cycle | |
| 1350 km on highway | 1060 km on highway | ||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
| Ground clearance: | 278 mm (10.9 inches) | 216 mm (8.5 inches) | |
| Because of the higher ground clearance, Land Rover Range Rover Sport can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds. | |||
| BMW X6 2019 3.0 engine: The B58 engine, compared to its predecessor, features a 20% increase in boost pressure, a closed-deck cylinder block design, an increased compression ratio of 11.0:1, and a slightly larger displacement of 2998 cc, up from 2979 cc, with an additional weight of 8 kg. Despite its advancements, the engine has several common ... More about BMW X6 2019 3.0 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.88 m | 4.94 m | |
| Width: | 2.07 m | 2.00 m | |
| Height: | 1.80 m | 1.70 m | |
| Land Rover Range Rover Sport is 6 cm shorter than the BMW X6, 7 cm wider, while the height of Land Rover Range Rover Sport is 11 cm higher. | |||
| Seats: | 7 seats | 5 seats | |
| Trunk capacity: | 220 litres | 580 litres | |
| Trunk capacity with 7 seats: | 220 litres | no data | |
| Trunk capacity with 5 seats: | 780 litres | 580 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
1686 litres | 1530 litres | |
| In 5-seat version Land Rover Range Rover Sport has more luggage space (by 200 litres). The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Land Rover Range Rover Sport (by 156 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 12.4 meters | 12.6 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Land Rover Range Rover Sport is 0.2 metres less than that of the BMW X6. | |||
| Gross weight: | 3`175 kg | 2`800 kg | |
| Net weight: | 2`210 kg | 2`235 kg | |
| Load capacity: | 965 kg | 565 kg | |
| Land Rover Range Rover Sport load capacity (permitted cargo and passenger weight) is par apmēram 41 procentiem more than BMW X6. Therefore, Land Rover Range Rover Sport is more suitable for longer family trips or transporting heavier loads. | |||
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | below average | |
| Average price (€): | 47 800 | 56 200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Land Rover Range Rover Sport has
|
BMW X6 has
| |