Land Rover Range Rover Sport 2017 vs Mercedes GLE 2015
| Comparing electrical vehicle (EV) with combustion engine (ICE) one is a complex task, but we are doing our best. | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
| Engine: | 2.0 Hybrid | 2.1 Diesel | |
| Hybrid engines (Land Rover Range Rover Sport) excel in urban environments with superior fuel efficiency and lower emissions during stop-and-go driving. Diesel engines (Mercedes GLE), however, are more fuel-efficient on long highway trips and provide greater torque for towing and heavy loads. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 300 HP | 204 HP | |
| Torque: | 400 NM | 500 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 6.7 seconds | 8.6 seconds | |
|
Land Rover Range Rover Sport is more dynamic to drive. Land Rover Range Rover Sport engine produces 96 HP more power than Mercedes GLE, but torque is 100 NM less than Mercedes GLE. Thanks to more power Land Rover Range Rover Sport reaches 100 km/h speed 1.9 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Consumption: | 2.8 l/100km + 26.3 kWh/100km | 6.6 l/100km | |
| Fuel cost per 100km: | 13.10 € | 12.50 € | |
|
Change fuel prices per unit to adjust the calculation to the fuel prices in your country. Petrol€/lElectricity€/kWhDiesel€/l | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 90 litres | 93 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | no data | 1400 km in combined cycle | |
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
| Ground clearance: | 278 mm (10.9 inches) | 202 mm (8 inches) | |
| Because of the higher ground clearance, Land Rover Range Rover Sport can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds. | |||
| Mercedes GLE 2015 2.1 engine: The engine has a long service life if it is serviced on time and has reasonable fuel consumption. The most common problems are caused by the engine chain tensioner and the fuel delivery system. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.88 m | 4.80 m | |
| Width: | 2.07 m | 1.93 m | |
| Height: | 1.80 m | 1.80 m | |
|
Land Rover Range Rover Sport is larger. Land Rover Range Rover Sport is 8 cm longer than the Mercedes GLE, 15 cm wider the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 780 litres | 690 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
1686 litres | 2010 litres | |
| Land Rover Range Rover Sport has 90 litres more trunk space than the Mercedes GLE. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Mercedes GLE (by 324 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 12.4 meters | 11.8 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Land Rover Range Rover Sport is 0.6 metres more than that of the Mercedes GLE, which means Land Rover Range Rover Sport can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight: | 3`200 kg | 2`950 kg | |
| Net weight: | 2`471 kg | 2`075 kg | |
| Load capacity: | 729 kg | 875 kg | |
| Land Rover Range Rover Sport load capacity (permitted cargo and passenger weight) is par apmēram 20 procentiem less than Mercedes GLE. Therefore, Mercedes GLE is more suitable for longer family trips or transporting heavier loads. | |||
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | high | |
| Average price (€): | 47 800 | 26 200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Land Rover Range Rover Sport has
|
Mercedes GLE has
| |