Land Rover Range Rover Sport 2017 vs BMW X5 2018
| Comparing electrical vehicle (EV) with combustion engine (ICE) one is a complex task, but we are doing our best. | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
| Engine: | 2.0 Hybrid | 2.0 Diesel | |
| Hybrid engines (Land Rover Range Rover Sport) excel in urban environments with superior fuel efficiency and lower emissions during stop-and-go driving. Diesel engines (BMW X5), however, are more fuel-efficient on long highway trips and provide greater torque for towing and heavy loads. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 300 HP | 231 HP | |
| Torque: | 400 NM | 450 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 6.7 seconds | 7.5 seconds | |
|
Land Rover Range Rover Sport is more dynamic to drive. Land Rover Range Rover Sport engine produces 69 HP more power than BMW X5, but torque is 50 NM less than BMW X5. Thanks to more power Land Rover Range Rover Sport reaches 100 km/h speed 0.8 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Consumption: | 2.8 l/100km + 26.3 kWh/100km | 6.2 l/100km | |
| Fuel cost per 100km: | 13.10 € | 11.70 € | |
|
Change fuel prices per unit to adjust the calculation to the fuel prices in your country. Petrol€/lElectricity€/kWhDiesel€/l | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 90 litres | 80 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | no data | 1290 km in combined cycle | |
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
| Ground clearance: | 278 mm (10.9 inches) | 214 mm (8.4 inches) | |
| Because of the higher ground clearance, Land Rover Range Rover Sport can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.88 m | 4.92 m | |
| Width: | 2.07 m | 2.00 m | |
| Height: | 1.80 m | 1.75 m | |
| Land Rover Range Rover Sport is 4 cm shorter than the BMW X5, 7 cm wider, while the height of Land Rover Range Rover Sport is 6 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 780 litres | 650 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
1686 litres | 1870 litres | |
| Even though the car is shorter, The BMW X5 may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in BMW X5 (by 184 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 12.4 meters | 12.6 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Land Rover Range Rover Sport is 0.2 metres less than that of the BMW X5. | |||
| Gross weight: | 3`200 kg | 2`820 kg | |
| Net weight: | 2`471 kg | 2`070 kg | |
| Load capacity: | 729 kg | 750 kg | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | below average | |
| Average price (€): | 47 800 | 50 800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Land Rover Range Rover Sport has
|
| |