Land Rover Range Rover Sport 2017 vs BMW X6 2019
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 4.4 Diesel | 4.4 Petrol | |
| Diesel (Land Rover Range Rover Sport) engines typically outperform gasoline engines in terms of fuel efficiency and low-end torque. This makes them more economical and better suited for towing or long-distance travel. However, gasoline (BMW X6) engines mostly are lighter, quieter, and offer better acceleration and responsiveness, especially in smaller vehicles. For more information, see the article "Diesel or Petrol: Fuel Economy and Key Differences." | |||
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 339 HP | 530 HP | |
| Torque: | 740 NM | 750 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 6.9 seconds | 4.3 seconds | |
|
BMW X6 is a more dynamic driving. Land Rover Range Rover Sport engine produces 191 HP less power than BMW X6, whereas torque is 10 NM less than BMW X6. Due to the lower power, Land Rover Range Rover Sport reaches 100 km/h speed 2.6 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.6 | 10.7 | |
|
The Land Rover Range Rover Sport is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Land Rover Range Rover Sport consumes 2.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the BMW X6, which means that by driving the Land Rover Range Rover Sport over 15,000 km in a year you can save 315 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 86 litres | 83 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1000 km in combined cycle | 770 km in combined cycle | |
| 1130 km on highway | 970 km on highway | ||
| Land Rover Range Rover Sport gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 560'000 km | 260'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Land Rover Range Rover Sport engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 10 years | 17 years | |
| Engine spread: | Used also on Land Rover Range Rover | Installed on at least 3 other car models, including BMW 5 sērija, BMW 7 sērija, BMW 8 sērija | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. BMW X6 might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.88 m | 4.94 m | |
| Width: | 2.07 m | 2.00 m | |
| Height: | 1.80 m | 1.70 m | |
| Land Rover Range Rover Sport is 6 cm shorter than the BMW X6, 7 cm wider, while the height of Land Rover Range Rover Sport is 11 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 780 litres | 580 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1530 litres | |
|
Land Rover Range Rover Sport has more luggage capacity. Even though the car is shorter, Land Rover Range Rover Sport has 200 litres more trunk space than the BMW X6. The BMW X6 may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 12.4 meters | 12.6 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Land Rover Range Rover Sport is 0.2 metres less than that of the BMW X6. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 3`200 | 2`975 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | below average | |
| Average price (€): | 65 800 | 76 000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Land Rover Range Rover Sport has
|
BMW X6 has
| |