Land Rover Range Rover Sport 2017 vs BMW X5 2018
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 4.4 Diesel | 4.4 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 339 HP | 462 HP | |
| Torque: | 740 NM | 650 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 6.9 seconds | 4.7 seconds | |
|
BMW X5 is a more dynamic driving. Land Rover Range Rover Sport engine produces 123 HP less power than BMW X5, but torque is 90 NM more than BMW X5. Due to the lower power, Land Rover Range Rover Sport reaches 100 km/h speed 2.2 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.6 | 11.6 | |
|
The Land Rover Range Rover Sport is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Land Rover Range Rover Sport consumes 3 litres less fuel per 100 km than the BMW X5, which means that by driving the Land Rover Range Rover Sport over 15,000 km in a year you can save 450 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 86 litres | 83 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1000 km in combined cycle | 710 km in combined cycle | |
| 1130 km on highway | 900 km on highway | ||
| Land Rover Range Rover Sport gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 560'000 km | 280'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Land Rover Range Rover Sport engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 10 years | 17 years | |
| Engine spread: | Used also on Land Rover Range Rover | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including BMW 5 sērija, BMW X7 | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. BMW X5 might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.88 m | 4.92 m | |
| Width: | 2.07 m | 2.00 m | |
| Height: | 1.80 m | 1.75 m | |
| Land Rover Range Rover Sport is 4 cm shorter than the BMW X5, 7 cm wider, while the height of Land Rover Range Rover Sport is 6 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 780 litres | 645 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1860 litres | |
|
Land Rover Range Rover Sport has more luggage capacity. Even though the car is shorter, Land Rover Range Rover Sport has 135 litres more trunk space than the BMW X5. The BMW X5 may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 12.4 meters | 12.6 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Land Rover Range Rover Sport is 0.2 metres less than that of the BMW X5. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 3`200 | 2`930 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | below average | |
| Average price (€): | 65 800 | 59 400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Land Rover Range Rover Sport has
|
BMW X5 has
| |