Land Rover Range Rover Sport 2017 vs BMW X5 2018

 
Land Rover Range Rover Sport
2017 -
BMW X5
2018 -
Gearbox: AutomaticAutomatic
Engine: 4.4 Diesel4.4 Petrol
Camshaft drive: Timing chainTiming chain

Performance

Power: 339 HP462 HP
Torque: 740 NM650 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 6.9 seconds4.7 seconds
BMW X5 is a more dynamic driving.
Land Rover Range Rover Sport engine produces 123 HP less power than BMW X5, but torque is 90 NM more than BMW X5. Due to the lower power, Land Rover Range Rover Sport reaches 100 km/h speed 2.2 seconds later.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 8.611.6
The Land Rover Range Rover Sport is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy.
Land Rover Range Rover Sport consumes 3 litres less fuel per 100 km than the BMW X5, which means that by driving the Land Rover Range Rover Sport over 15,000 km in a year you can save 450 litres of fuel.
Fuel tank capacity: 86 litres83 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 1000 km in combined cycle710 km in combined cycle
1130 km on highway900 km on highway
Land Rover Range Rover Sport gets more mileage on one fuel tank.

Drive type

Wheel drive type: All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4)All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4)

Engines

Average engine lifespan: 560'000 km280'000 km
Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Land Rover Range Rover Sport engine could be longer.
Engine production duration: 10 years16 years
Engine spread: Used also on Land Rover Range RoverInstalled on at least 2 other car models, including BMW 5 sērija, BMW X7
In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. BMW X5 might be a better choice in this respect.

Dimensions

Length: 4.88 m4.92 m
Width: 2.07 m2.00 m
Height: 1.80 m1.75 m
Land Rover Range Rover Sport is 4 cm shorter than the BMW X5, 7 cm wider, while the height of Land Rover Range Rover Sport is 6 cm higher.
Trunk capacity: 780 litres645 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
no data1860 litres
Land Rover Range Rover Sport has more luggage capacity.
Even though the car is shorter, Land Rover Range Rover Sport has 135 litres more trunk space than the BMW X5. The BMW X5 may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers.
Turning diameter: 12.4 meters12.6 meters
The turning circle of the Land Rover Range Rover Sport is 0.2 metres less than that of the BMW X5.
Gross weight (kg): 3`2002`930
Safety: no data
Quality: no data
below average
Average price (€): 63 80060 000
Pros and Cons: Land Rover Range Rover Sport has
  • lower fuel consumption
  • more full fuel tank mileage
  • longer expected engine lifespan
  • roomier boot
BMW X5 has
  • more power
  • more dynamic
  • lower price
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv