Land Rover Range Rover Sport 2017 vs Volvo XC90 2019
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 3.0 Diesel | 2.0 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain and belt | Timing belt | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 249 HP | 235 HP | |
| Torque: | 600 NM | 480 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 7.6 seconds | 7.6 seconds | |
| Land Rover Range Rover Sport engine produces 14 HP more power than Volvo XC90, whereas torque is 120 NM more than Volvo XC90. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.9 | 7.7 | |
|
The Land Rover Range Rover Sport is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Land Rover Range Rover Sport consumes 0.8 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Volvo XC90, which means that by driving the Land Rover Range Rover Sport over 15,000 km in a year you can save 120 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 86 litres | 71 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1240 km in combined cycle | 920 km in combined cycle | |
| Land Rover Range Rover Sport gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 420'000 km | 350'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Land Rover Range Rover Sport engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 16 years | 9 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 3 other car models, including Land Rover Range Rover, Land Rover Discovery | Installed on at least 4 other car models, including Volvo XC60, Volvo S90, Volvo V90, Volvo V90 Cross Country | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. | |||
| Hydraulic tappets: | yes | no | |
| The Land Rover Range Rover Sport engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.88 m | 4.95 m | |
| Width: | 2.07 m | 2.01 m | |
| Height: | 1.80 m | 1.78 m | |
| Land Rover Range Rover Sport is 7 cm shorter than the Volvo XC90, 7 cm wider, while the height of Land Rover Range Rover Sport is 3 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 780 litres | 368 litres | |
|
Land Rover Range Rover Sport has more luggage capacity. Even though the car is shorter, Land Rover Range Rover Sport has 412 litres more trunk space than the Volvo XC90. The Volvo XC90 may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 12.4 meters | 11.8 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Land Rover Range Rover Sport is 0.6 metres more than that of the Volvo XC90, which means Land Rover Range Rover Sport can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 3`000 | 2`750 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 65 800 | 45 200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Land Rover Range Rover Sport has
|
Volvo XC90 has
| |