Land Rover Range Rover Sport 2017 vs Toyota Land Cruiser 2017
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 3.0 Diesel | 2.8 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain and belt | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 306 HP | 177 HP | |
| Torque: | 700 NM | 450 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 7.2 seconds | 12.7 seconds | |
|
Land Rover Range Rover Sport is more dynamic to drive. Land Rover Range Rover Sport engine produces 129 HP more power than Toyota Land Cruiser, whereas torque is 250 NM more than Toyota Land Cruiser. Thanks to more power Land Rover Range Rover Sport reaches 100 km/h speed 5.5 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.0 | 7.4 | |
|
The Land Rover Range Rover Sport is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Land Rover Range Rover Sport consumes 0.4 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Toyota Land Cruiser, which means that by driving the Land Rover Range Rover Sport over 15,000 km in a year you can save 60 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 86 litres | 87 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1220 km in combined cycle | 1170 km in combined cycle | |
| 1340 km on highway | 1380 km on highway | ||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
| Ground clearance: | 278 mm (10.9 inches) | 215 mm (8.5 inches) | |
| Because of the higher ground clearance, Land Rover Range Rover Sport can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds. | |||
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 420'000 km | 350'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Land Rover Range Rover Sport engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 17 years | 11 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 3 other car models, including Land Rover Range Rover, Land Rover Discovery | Used also on Toyota Hilux | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Land Rover Range Rover Sport might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Toyota Land Cruiser 2017 2.8 engine: The 1GD-FTV diesel engine was introduced by Toyota in 2015 to address the shortcomings of the earlier KD series, such as high noise levels, poor performance, low fuel efficiency, environmental concerns, and ... More about Toyota Land Cruiser 2017 2.8 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.88 m | 4.84 m | |
| Width: | 2.07 m | 1.86 m | |
| Height: | 1.80 m | 1.85 m | |
|
Land Rover Range Rover Sport is larger, but lower. Land Rover Range Rover Sport is 4 cm longer than the Toyota Land Cruiser, 22 cm wider, while the height of Land Rover Range Rover Sport is 4 cm lower. | |||
| Seats: | 7 seats | no data | |
| Trunk capacity: | 220 litres | 621 litres | |
| Trunk capacity with 7 seats: | 220 litres | no data | |
| Trunk capacity with 5 seats: | 780 litres | 621 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
1686 litres | 1934 litres | |
| In 5-seat version Land Rover Range Rover Sport has more luggage space (by 159 litres). The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Toyota Land Cruiser (by 248 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 12.4 meters | 11.6 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Land Rover Range Rover Sport is 0.8 metres more than that of the Toyota Land Cruiser, which means Land Rover Range Rover Sport can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight: | 3`200 kg | 2`990 kg | |
| Net weight: | 2`178 kg | 2`165 kg | |
| Load capacity: | 1`022 kg | 825 kg | |
| Land Rover Range Rover Sport load capacity (permitted cargo and passenger weight) is par apmēram 19 procentiem more than Toyota Land Cruiser. Therefore, Land Rover Range Rover Sport is more suitable for longer family trips or transporting heavier loads. | |||
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 47 400 | 44 600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Land Rover Range Rover Sport has
|
Toyota Land Cruiser has
| |