Land Rover Range Rover Sport 2017 vs Porsche Cayenne 2017
| Comparing electrical vehicle (EV) with combustion engine (ICE) one is a complex task, but we are doing our best. | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
| Engine: | 3.0 Diesel | 3.0 Hybrid | |
| Diesel (Land Rover Range Rover Sport) engines offer better fuel efficiency on highways and deliver high torque, making them ideal for long-distance driving and heavy-duty use. Hybrid (Porsche Cayenne) engines, however, are more fuel efficient in city traffic and produce lower emissions, especially during low-speed or stop-and-go conditions. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 306 HP | 340 HP | |
| Torque: | 700 NM | 450 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 7.2 seconds | 5 seconds | |
|
Porsche Cayenne is a more dynamic driving. Land Rover Range Rover Sport engine produces 34 HP less power than Porsche Cayenne, but torque is 250 NM more than Porsche Cayenne. Due to the lower power, Land Rover Range Rover Sport reaches 100 km/h speed 2.2 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Consumption: | 7.0 l/100km | ||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 86 litres | 75 litres | |
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
| Ground clearance: | 278 mm (10.9 inches) | 210 mm (8.3 inches) | |
| Because of the higher ground clearance, Land Rover Range Rover Sport can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.88 m | 4.93 m | |
| Width: | 2.07 m | 1.98 m | |
| Height: | 1.80 m | 1.67 m | |
| Land Rover Range Rover Sport is 5 cm shorter than the Porsche Cayenne, 9 cm wider, while the height of Land Rover Range Rover Sport is 13 cm higher. | |||
| Seats: | 7 seats | 5 seats | |
| Trunk capacity: | 220 litres | 645 litres | |
| Trunk capacity with 7 seats: | 220 litres | no data | |
| Trunk capacity with 5 seats: | 780 litres | 645 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
1686 litres | 1607 litres | |
| In 5-seat version Land Rover Range Rover Sport has more luggage space (by 135 litres). The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Land Rover Range Rover Sport (by 79 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 12.4 meters | 11.5 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Land Rover Range Rover Sport is 0.9 metres more than that of the Porsche Cayenne, which means Land Rover Range Rover Sport can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight: | 3`200 kg | 3`030 kg | |
| Net weight: | 2`178 kg | 2`295 kg | |
| Load capacity: | 1`022 kg | 735 kg | |
| Land Rover Range Rover Sport load capacity (permitted cargo and passenger weight) is par apmēram 28 procentiem more than Porsche Cayenne. Therefore, Land Rover Range Rover Sport is more suitable for longer family trips or transporting heavier loads. | |||
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | above average | |
| Average price (€): | 47 400 | 68 000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Land Rover Range Rover Sport has
|
Porsche Cayenne has
| |