Land Rover Range Rover Sport 2017 vs Jeep Wrangler 2017
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 3.0 Diesel | 3.0 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain and belt | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 306 HP | 260 HP | |
| Torque: | 700 NM | 600 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 7.2 seconds | n/a seconds | |
| Land Rover Range Rover Sport engine produces 46 HP more power than Jeep Wrangler, whereas torque is 100 NM more than Jeep Wrangler. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.0 | 9.4 | |
|
The Land Rover Range Rover Sport is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Land Rover Range Rover Sport consumes 2.4 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Jeep Wrangler, which means that by driving the Land Rover Range Rover Sport over 15,000 km in a year you can save 360 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 86 litres | 69 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1220 km in combined cycle | 730 km in combined cycle | |
| 1340 km on highway | 850 km on highway | ||
| Land Rover Range Rover Sport gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 420'000 km | 350'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Land Rover Range Rover Sport engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 16 years | 6 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 3 other car models, including Land Rover Range Rover, Land Rover Discovery | Used only for this car | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Land Rover Range Rover Sport might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.88 m | 4.79 m | |
| Width: | 2.07 m | 1.88 m | |
| Height: | 1.80 m | 1.87 m | |
|
Land Rover Range Rover Sport is larger, but lower. Land Rover Range Rover Sport is 9 cm longer than the Jeep Wrangler, 20 cm wider, while the height of Land Rover Range Rover Sport is 7 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 780 litres | 898 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 2050 litres | |
|
Jeep Wrangler has more luggage space. Despite its longer length, Land Rover Range Rover Sport has 118 litres less trunk space than the Jeep Wrangler. This could mean that the Land Rover Range Rover Sport uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 12.4 meters | 12 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Land Rover Range Rover Sport is 0.4 metres more than that of the Jeep Wrangler, which means Land Rover Range Rover Sport can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 3`050 | no data | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 56 000 | 48 200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Land Rover Range Rover Sport has
|
Jeep Wrangler has
| |