Land Rover Range Rover Sport 2017 vs BMW X6 2014
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 3.0 Diesel | 3.0 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 306 HP | 249 HP | |
| Torque: | 700 NM | 560 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 7.2 seconds | 6.7 seconds | |
| Land Rover Range Rover Sport engine produces 57 HP more power than BMW X6, whereas torque is 140 NM more than BMW X6. Despite the higher power, Land Rover Range Rover Sport reaches 100 km/h speed 0.5 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.0 | 6.0 | |
|
The BMW X6 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Land Rover Range Rover Sport consumes 1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the BMW X6, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Land Rover Range Rover Sport could require 150 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 86 litres | 85 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1220 km in combined cycle | 1410 km in combined cycle | |
| 1340 km on highway | 1540 km on highway | ||
| BMW X6 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
| Ground clearance: | 278 mm (10.9 inches) | 212 mm (8.3 inches) | |
| Because of the higher ground clearance, Land Rover Range Rover Sport can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.88 m | 4.91 m | |
| Width: | 2.07 m | 1.99 m | |
| Height: | 1.80 m | 1.70 m | |
| Land Rover Range Rover Sport is 3 cm shorter than the BMW X6, 8 cm wider, while the height of Land Rover Range Rover Sport is 10 cm higher. | |||
| Seats: | 7 seats | no data | |
| Trunk capacity: | 220 litres | 580 litres | |
| Trunk capacity with 7 seats: | 220 litres | no data | |
| Trunk capacity with 5 seats: | 780 litres | 580 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
1686 litres | 1525 litres | |
| In 5-seat version Land Rover Range Rover Sport has more luggage space (by 200 litres). The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Land Rover Range Rover Sport (by 161 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 12.4 meters | 12.8 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Land Rover Range Rover Sport is 0.4 metres less than that of the BMW X6, which means Land Rover Range Rover Sport can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight: | 3`200 kg | 2`780 kg | |
| Net weight: | 2`178 kg | 2`065 kg | |
| Load capacity: | 1`022 kg | 715 kg | |
| Land Rover Range Rover Sport load capacity (permitted cargo and passenger weight) is par apmēram 30 procentiem more than BMW X6. Therefore, Land Rover Range Rover Sport is more suitable for longer family trips or transporting heavier loads. | |||
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | below average | |
| Average price (€): | 47 400 | 30 000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Land Rover Range Rover Sport has
|
BMW X6 has
| |