Land Rover Range Rover Sport 2017 vs BMW X5 2013
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 3.0 Diesel | 3.0 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain and belt | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 306 HP | 381 HP | |
| Torque: | 700 NM | 740 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 7.2 seconds | 5.3 seconds | |
|
BMW X5 is a more dynamic driving. Land Rover Range Rover Sport engine produces 75 HP less power than BMW X5, whereas torque is 40 NM less than BMW X5. Due to the lower power, Land Rover Range Rover Sport reaches 100 km/h speed 1.9 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.0 | 6.7 | |
| Land Rover Range Rover Sport consumes 0.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than the BMW X5, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Land Rover Range Rover Sport could require 45 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 86 litres | 85 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1220 km in combined cycle | 1260 km in combined cycle | |
| 1340 km on highway | 1370 km on highway | ||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | 4x4 - AWD (all-wheel-drive) | |
| Ground clearance: | 278 mm (10.9 inches) | 209 mm (8.2 inches) | |
| Because of the higher ground clearance, Land Rover Range Rover Sport can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds. | |||
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 420'000 km | 300'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Land Rover Range Rover Sport engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 17 years | 18 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 3 other car models, including Land Rover Range Rover, Land Rover Discovery | Installed on at least 3 other car models, including BMW 5 sērija, BMW 7 sērija, BMW X6 | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. | |||
| BMW X5 2013 3.0 engine: The N57 engine is a robust turbo diesel unit without any major systemic issues. Its longevity depends heavily on regular maintenance, including timely servicing, periodic cleaning of the intake system, and active regeneration of the diesel particulate filter.
The ... More about BMW X5 2013 3.0 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.88 m | 4.89 m | |
| Width: | 2.07 m | 1.94 m | |
| Height: | 1.80 m | 1.76 m | |
| Land Rover Range Rover Sport and BMW X5 are practically the same length. | |||
| Seats: | 7 seats | no data | |
| Trunk capacity: | 220 litres | 650 litres | |
| Trunk capacity with 7 seats: | 220 litres | no data | |
| Trunk capacity with 5 seats: | 780 litres | 650 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
1686 litres | 1870 litres | |
| In 5-seat version Land Rover Range Rover Sport has more luggage space (by 130 litres). The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in BMW X5 (by 184 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 12.4 meters | 12.7 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Land Rover Range Rover Sport is 0.3 metres less than that of the BMW X5. | |||
| Gross weight: | 3`200 kg | 2`900 kg | |
| Net weight: | 2`178 kg | 2`190 kg | |
| Load capacity: | 1`022 kg | 710 kg | |
| Land Rover Range Rover Sport load capacity (permitted cargo and passenger weight) is par apmēram 31 procentiem more than BMW X5. Therefore, Land Rover Range Rover Sport is more suitable for longer family trips or transporting heavier loads. | |||
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | below average | |
| Average price (€): | 47 400 | 20 800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Land Rover Range Rover Sport has
|
BMW X5 has
| |