Land Rover Range Rover Sport 2017 vs BMW X6 2019
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 3.0 Petrol | 3.0 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 380 HP | 340 HP | |
| Torque: | 450 NM | 450 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | 5.5 seconds | |
| Land Rover Range Rover Sport engine produces 40 HP more power than BMW X6, the torque is the same for both cars. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 10.5 | 8.6 | |
|
The BMW X6 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Land Rover Range Rover Sport consumes 1.9 litres more fuel per 100 km than the BMW X6, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Land Rover Range Rover Sport could require 285 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 104 litres | 83 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 990 km in combined cycle | 960 km in combined cycle | |
| 1230 km on highway | 1060 km on highway | ||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 390'000 km | 330'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Land Rover Range Rover Sport engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 13 years | 10 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 3 other car models, including Land Rover Range Rover, Land Rover Discovery | Installed on at least 11 other car models, including BMW 5 sērija, BMW 3 sērija, BMW X5, BMW 7 sērija, BMW 1 sērija | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. | |||
| Hydraulic tappets: | no | yes | |
| The BMW X6 engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure. | |||
| BMW X6 2019 3.0 engine: The B58 engine, compared to its predecessor, features a 20% increase in boost pressure, a closed-deck cylinder block design, an increased compression ratio of 11.0:1, and a slightly larger displacement of 2998 cc, up from 2979 cc, with an additional weight of 8 kg. Despite its advancements, the engine has several common ... More about BMW X6 2019 3.0 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.88 m | 4.94 m | |
| Width: | 2.07 m | 2.00 m | |
| Height: | 1.80 m | 1.70 m | |
| Land Rover Range Rover Sport is 6 cm shorter than the BMW X6, 7 cm wider, while the height of Land Rover Range Rover Sport is 11 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 780 litres | 580 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1530 litres | |
|
Land Rover Range Rover Sport has more luggage capacity. Even though the car is shorter, Land Rover Range Rover Sport has 200 litres more trunk space than the BMW X6. The BMW X6 may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 12.4 meters | 12.6 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Land Rover Range Rover Sport is 0.2 metres less than that of the BMW X6. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 3`000 | 2`800 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | below average | |
| Average price (€): | 65 800 | 76 000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Land Rover Range Rover Sport has
|
BMW X6 has
| |