Land Rover Range Rover Sport 2017 vs BMW X6 2019
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 3.0 Petrol | 3.0 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 340 HP | 340 HP | |
| Torque: | 450 NM | 450 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 7.2 seconds | 5.5 seconds | |
| Land Rover Range Rover Sport and BMW X6 have the same engine power, the torque is the same for both cars. Land Rover Range Rover Sport reaches 100 km/h speed 1.7 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 10.5 | 8.6 | |
|
The BMW X6 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Land Rover Range Rover Sport consumes 1.9 litres more fuel per 100 km than the BMW X6, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Land Rover Range Rover Sport could require 285 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 104 litres | 83 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 990 km in combined cycle | 960 km in combined cycle | |
| 1230 km on highway | 1060 km on highway | ||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
| Ground clearance: | 278 mm (10.9 inches) | 216 mm (8.5 inches) | |
| Because of the higher ground clearance, Land Rover Range Rover Sport can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds. | |||
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 390'000 km | 330'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Land Rover Range Rover Sport engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 14 years | 11 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 3 other car models, including Land Rover Range Rover, Land Rover Discovery | Installed on at least 11 other car models, including BMW 5 sērija, BMW 3 sērija, BMW X5, BMW 7 sērija, BMW 1 sērija | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. | |||
| Hydraulic tappets: | no | yes | |
| The BMW X6 engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure. | |||
| BMW X6 2019 3.0 engine: The B58 engine, compared to its predecessor, features a 20% increase in boost pressure, a closed-deck cylinder block design, an increased compression ratio of 11.0:1, and a slightly larger displacement of 2998 cc, up from 2979 cc, with an additional weight of 8 kg. Despite its advancements, the engine has several common ... More about BMW X6 2019 3.0 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.88 m | 4.94 m | |
| Width: | 2.07 m | 2.00 m | |
| Height: | 1.80 m | 1.70 m | |
| Land Rover Range Rover Sport is 6 cm shorter than the BMW X6, 7 cm wider, while the height of Land Rover Range Rover Sport is 11 cm higher. | |||
| Seats: | 7 seats | 5 seats | |
| Trunk capacity: | 220 litres | 580 litres | |
| Trunk capacity with 7 seats: | 220 litres | no data | |
| Trunk capacity with 5 seats: | 780 litres | 580 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
1686 litres | 1530 litres | |
| In 5-seat version Land Rover Range Rover Sport has more luggage space (by 200 litres). The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Land Rover Range Rover Sport (by 156 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 12.4 meters | 12.6 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Land Rover Range Rover Sport is 0.2 metres less than that of the BMW X6. | |||
| Gross weight: | 3`130 kg | 2`800 kg | |
| Net weight: | 2`195 kg | 2`235 kg | |
| Load capacity: | 935 kg | 565 kg | |
| Land Rover Range Rover Sport load capacity (permitted cargo and passenger weight) is par apmēram 40 procentiem more than BMW X6. Therefore, Land Rover Range Rover Sport is more suitable for longer family trips or transporting heavier loads. | |||
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | below average | |
| Average price (€): | 47 400 | 55 600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Land Rover Range Rover Sport has
|
BMW X6 has
| |