Land Rover Range Rover Sport 2017 vs BMW X5 2018
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Petrol | 2.0 Diesel | |
| Petrol engines (Land Rover Range Rover Sport) are generally quieter, smoother, and better suited for short trips due to quicker warm-up times. Diesel (BMW X5) engines, on the other hand, offer superior fuel efficiency and torque, making them ideal for long-distance driving and heavy loads. Read more: Petrol vs. Diesel: Fuel Economy and Key Differences. | |||
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 300 HP | 231 HP | |
| Torque: | 400 NM | 450 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 7.3 seconds | 7.5 seconds | |
|
Land Rover Range Rover Sport is more dynamic to drive. Land Rover Range Rover Sport engine produces 69 HP more power than BMW X5, but torque is 50 NM less than BMW X5. Thanks to more power Land Rover Range Rover Sport reaches 100 km/h speed 0.2 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 9.2 | 6.2 | |
|
The BMW X5 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Land Rover Range Rover Sport consumes 3 litres more fuel per 100 km than the BMW X5, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Land Rover Range Rover Sport could require 450 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 104 litres | 80 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1130 km in combined cycle | 1290 km in combined cycle | |
| 1280 km on highway | 1310 km on highway | ||
| BMW X5 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 330'000 km | 330'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 9 years | 12 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 4 other car models, including Land Rover Defender, Land Rover Range Rover Evoque | Used also on BMW 5 sērija | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.88 m | 4.92 m | |
| Width: | 2.07 m | 2.00 m | |
| Height: | 1.80 m | 1.75 m | |
| Land Rover Range Rover Sport is 4 cm shorter than the BMW X5, 7 cm wider, while the height of Land Rover Range Rover Sport is 6 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 780 litres | 650 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
no data | 1870 litres | |
|
Land Rover Range Rover Sport has more luggage capacity. Even though the car is shorter, The BMW X5 may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 12.4 meters | 12.6 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Land Rover Range Rover Sport is 0.2 metres less than that of the BMW X5. | |||
| Gross weight: | 2`900 kg | 2`820 kg | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | below average | |
| Average price (€): | 47 800 | 50 600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Land Rover Range Rover Sport has
|
BMW X5 has
| |