Land Rover Range Rover Sport 2017 vs BMW X3 2017
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Petrol | 2.0 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 300 HP | 252 HP | |
| Torque: | 400 NM | 350 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 7.3 seconds | 6.3 seconds | |
| Land Rover Range Rover Sport engine produces 48 HP more power than BMW X3, whereas torque is 50 NM more than BMW X3. Despite the higher power, Land Rover Range Rover Sport reaches 100 km/h speed 1 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 9.2 | no data | |
| Fuel tank capacity: | 104 litres | 65 litres | |
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 330'000 km | 320'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 9 years | 12 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 4 other car models, including Land Rover Defender, Land Rover Range Rover Evoque | Installed on at least 6 other car models, including BMW 5 sērija, BMW 3 sērija, BMW 1 sērija, BMW 4 sērija | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. BMW X3 might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| BMW X3 2017 2.0 engine: Compared to their predecessors, B48 engines are more robust and less prone to major failures. They are well-suited for chip tuning, which can noticeably enhance performance and responsiveness without ... More about BMW X3 2017 2.0 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.88 m | 4.71 m | |
| Width: | 2.07 m | 1.89 m | |
| Height: | 1.80 m | 1.68 m | |
|
Land Rover Range Rover Sport is larger. Land Rover Range Rover Sport is 17 cm longer than the BMW X3, 18 cm wider, while the height of Land Rover Range Rover Sport is 13 cm higher. | |||
| Seats: | 7 seats | no data | |
| Trunk capacity: | 220 litres | 550 litres | |
| Trunk capacity with 7 seats: | 220 litres | no data | |
| Trunk capacity with 5 seats: | 780 litres | 550 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
1686 litres | 1600 litres | |
| In 5-seat version Land Rover Range Rover Sport has more luggage space (by 230 litres). The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Land Rover Range Rover Sport (by 86 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 12.4 meters | 12 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Land Rover Range Rover Sport is 0.4 metres more than that of the BMW X3, which means Land Rover Range Rover Sport can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight: | 3`000 kg | 2`385 kg | |
| Net weight: | 2`083 kg | 1`790 kg | |
| Load capacity: | 917 kg | 595 kg | |
| Land Rover Range Rover Sport load capacity (permitted cargo and passenger weight) is par apmēram 35 procentiem more than BMW X3. Therefore, Land Rover Range Rover Sport is more suitable for longer family trips or transporting heavier loads. | |||
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | average | |
| Average price (€): | 47 400 | 23 400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Land Rover Range Rover Sport has
|
BMW X3 has
| |