Land Rover Range Rover Sport 2005 vs Jeep Grand Cherokee 2005
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 2.7 - 4.4 | 3.0 - 6.1 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 190 - 390 HP | 201 - 425 HP | |
| Torque: | 425 - 640 NM | 307 - 570 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 7.6 - 12.7 seconds | 5 - 10.7 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 10.2 - 15.9 | 10.2 - 16.4 | |
|
Land Rover Range Rover Sport petrol engines consumes on average 0.4 litres more fuel per 100 km than Jeep Grand Cherokee. On average, Land Rover Range Rover Sport equipped with diesel engines consume 0.5 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Jeep Grand Cherokee. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
| Ground clearance: | 227 mm (8.9 inches) | 178 - 204 mm (7 - 8 inches) | |
| Because of the higher ground clearance, Land Rover Range Rover Sport can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.79 m | 4.75 m | |
| Width: | 1.93 m | 1.87 m | |
| Height: | 1.78 m | 1.74 m | |
|
Land Rover Range Rover Sport is larger. Land Rover Range Rover Sport is 4 cm longer than the Jeep Grand Cherokee, 6 cm wider, while the height of Land Rover Range Rover Sport is 4 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 960 litres | 978 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
2013 litres | 1909 litres | |
| Despite its longer length, This could mean that the Land Rover Range Rover Sport uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Land Rover Range Rover Sport (by 104 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.6 meters | 11.2 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Land Rover Range Rover Sport is 0.4 metres more than that of the Jeep Grand Cherokee, which means Land Rover Range Rover Sport can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight: | ~ 3`110 kg | ~ 2`750 kg | |
| Net weight: | ~ 2`546 kg | ~ 2`130 kg | |
| Load capacity: | ~ 564 kg | ~ 620 kg | |
| Land Rover Range Rover Sport load capacity (permitted cargo and passenger weight) is par apmēram 10 procentiem less than Jeep Grand Cherokee. Therefore, Jeep Grand Cherokee is more suitable for longer family trips or transporting heavier loads. | |||
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | average | |
| Average price (€): | 5200 | 5200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Land Rover Range Rover Sport has
|
Jeep Grand Cherokee has
| |