Land Rover Range Rover Sport 2005 vs Land Rover Range Rover 2005
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 2.7 - 4.4 | 2.9 - 4.4 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 190 - 390 HP | 174 - 396 HP | |
| Torque: | 425 - 640 NM | 390 - 640 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 7.6 - 12.7 seconds | 7.5 - 13.6 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 10.2 - 15.9 | 11.3 - 16.0 | |
|
Land Rover Range Rover Sport petrol engines consumes on average 0.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than Land Rover Range Rover. On average, Land Rover Range Rover Sport equipped with diesel engines consume 0.7 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Land Rover Range Rover. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.79 m | 4.95 m | |
| Width: | 1.93 m | 1.96 m | |
| Height: | 1.78 m | 1.82 m | |
|
Land Rover Range Rover Sport is smaller. Land Rover Range Rover Sport is 16 cm shorter than the Land Rover Range Rover, 3 cm narrower, while the height of Land Rover Range Rover Sport is 5 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 960 litres | 535 litres | |
|
Land Rover Range Rover Sport has more luggage capacity. Even though the car is shorter, Land Rover Range Rover Sport has 425 litres more trunk space than the Land Rover Range Rover. The Land Rover Range Rover may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.6 meters | 11.6 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 3`500 | ~ 3`500 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 5600 | 7400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Land Rover Range Rover Sport has
|
| |