Land Rover Range Rover Sport 2005 vs Land Rover Range Rover Sport 2009
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 2.7 - 4.4 | 3.0 - 5.0 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 190 - 390 HP | 245 - 510 HP | |
| Torque: | 425 - 640 NM | 315 - 640 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 7.6 - 12.7 seconds | 6.2 - 9.3 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 10.2 - 15.9 | 9.2 - 15.0 | |
|
Land Rover Range Rover Sport 2005 petrol engines consumes on average 0.4 litres more fuel per 100 km than Land Rover Range Rover Sport 2009. On average, Land Rover Range Rover Sport 2005 equipped with diesel engines consume 1.5 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Land Rover Range Rover Sport 2009. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.79 m | 4.79 m | |
| Width: | 1.93 m | 2.12 m | |
| Height: | 1.78 m | 1.81 m | |
| Land Rover Range Rover Sport 2005 and Land Rover Range Rover Sport 2009 are practically the same length. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 960 litres | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 11.6 meters | no data | |
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 3`500 | ~ 3`134 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 5600 | 9600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Land Rover Range Rover Sport has
|
Land Rover Range Rover Sport has
| |