Land Rover Range Rover Sport 2009 vs Land Rover Freelander 2012
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Land Rover Range Rover Sport is available only with automatic gearbox, whereas Land Rover Freelander has both automatic and manual transmission options. | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | Front wheel drive (FWD) / All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
| Land Rover Range Rover Sport is available only with four wheel (4x4) drive, while Land Rover Freelander can be equipped with front wheel drive and four wheel (4x4) drive. All-wheel drive models tend to consume more fuel, so if you don't need off road capabilities, Land Rover Freelander also offers 2-wheel drive versions for fuel economy. 2WD versions also have lower maintenance costs. | |||
| Engines: | 3.0 - 5.0 | 2.0 - 2.2 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 245 - 510 HP | 150 - 240 HP | |
| Torque: | 315 - 640 NM | 340 - 420 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 6.2 - 9.3 seconds | 8.8 - 11.7 seconds | |
| In general, Land Rover Range Rover Sport are available with more powerful and dynamic engines than Land Rover Freelander. Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 9.2 - 15.0 | 6.0 - 9.6 | |
|
Land Rover Range Rover Sport petrol engines consumes on average 4.9 litres more fuel per 100 km than Land Rover Freelander. On average, Land Rover Range Rover Sport equipped with diesel engines consume 3.7 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Land Rover Freelander. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.79 m | 4.50 m | |
| Width: | 2.12 m | 1.91 m | |
| Height: | 1.81 m | 1.74 m | |
|
Land Rover Range Rover Sport is larger. Land Rover Range Rover Sport is 29 cm longer than the Land Rover Freelander, 21 cm wider, while the height of Land Rover Range Rover Sport is 7 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 958 litres | 405 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
2013 litres | no data | |
|
Land Rover Range Rover Sport has more luggage capacity. Land Rover Range Rover Sport has 553 litres more trunk space than the Land Rover Freelander. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.9 meters | 11.3 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Land Rover Range Rover Sport is 0.6 metres more than that of the Land Rover Freelander, which means Land Rover Range Rover Sport can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight: | ~ 3`123 kg | ~ 2`505 kg | |
| Net weight: | ~ 2`540 kg | ~ 1`776 kg | |
| Load capacity: | ~ 583 kg | ~ 729 kg | |
| Land Rover Range Rover Sport load capacity (permitted cargo and passenger weight) is par apmēram 25 procentiem less than Land Rover Freelander. Therefore, Land Rover Freelander is more suitable for longer family trips or transporting heavier loads. | |||
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 8600 | 7600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Land Rover Range Rover Sport has
|
Land Rover Freelander has
| |