Land Rover Range Rover Sport 2009 vs Mercedes ML 2008
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 3.0 - 5.0 | 3.0 - 6.2 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 245 - 510 HP | 190 - 510 HP | |
| Torque: | 315 - 640 NM | 350 - 700 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 6.2 - 9.3 seconds | 5 - 9.8 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 9.2 - 15.0 | 8.4 - 16.5 | |
|
Land Rover Range Rover Sport petrol engines consumes on average 0.9 litres more fuel per 100 km than Mercedes ML. On average, Land Rover Range Rover Sport equipped with diesel engines consume 0.7 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mercedes ML. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
| Ground clearance: | 227 mm (8.9 inches) | 201 - 500 mm (7.9 - 19.7 inches) | |
| Because of the higher ground clearance, Land Rover Range Rover Sport can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.79 m | 4.78 m | |
| Width: | 2.12 m | 1.91 m | |
| Height: | 1.81 m | 1.82 m | |
|
Land Rover Range Rover Sport is larger, but slightly lower. Land Rover Range Rover Sport is 1 cm longer than the Mercedes ML, 21 cm wider, while the height of Land Rover Range Rover Sport is 1 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 958 litres | 551 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
2013 litres | 2050 litres | |
| Land Rover Range Rover Sport has 407 litres more trunk space than the Mercedes ML. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Mercedes ML (by 37 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.9 meters | 12 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Land Rover Range Rover Sport is 0.1 metres less than that of the Mercedes ML. | |||
| Gross weight: | ~ 3`123 kg | ~ 2`854 kg | |
| Net weight: | ~ 2`540 kg | ~ 2`144 kg | |
| Load capacity: | ~ 583 kg | ~ 710 kg | |
| Land Rover Range Rover Sport load capacity (permitted cargo and passenger weight) is par apmēram 22 procentiem less than Mercedes ML. Therefore, Mercedes ML is more suitable for longer family trips or transporting heavier loads. | |||
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | average | |
| Average price (€): | 8600 | 7600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Land Rover Range Rover Sport has
|
Mercedes ML has
| |