Land Rover Range Rover Sport 2009 vs Land Rover Range Rover Sport 2005
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 3.0 - 5.0 | 2.7 - 4.4 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 245 - 510 HP | 190 - 390 HP | |
| Torque: | 315 - 640 NM | 425 - 640 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 6.2 - 9.3 seconds | 7.6 - 12.7 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 9.2 - 15.0 | 10.2 - 15.9 | |
|
Land Rover Range Rover Sport 2009 petrol engines consumes on average 0.4 litres less fuel per 100 km than Land Rover Range Rover Sport 2005. On average, Land Rover Range Rover Sport 2009 equipped with diesel engines consume 1.5 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Land Rover Range Rover Sport 2005. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.79 m | 4.79 m | |
| Width: | 2.12 m | 1.93 m | |
| Height: | 1.81 m | 1.78 m | |
| Land Rover Range Rover Sport 2009 and Land Rover Range Rover Sport 2005 are practically the same length. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 960 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | no data | 11.6 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 3`134 | ~ 3`500 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 9600 | 5600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Land Rover Range Rover Sport has
|
Land Rover Range Rover Sport has
| |