Land Rover Range Rover Sport 2009 vs BMW X5 2010

Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison

 
Land Rover Range Rover Sport
2009 - 2013
BMW X5
2010 - 2013
Gearbox: Automatic Automatic
Engines: 3.0 - 5.03.0 - 4.4

Performance

Power: 245 - 510 HP245 - 408 HP
Torque: 315 - 640 NM400 - 740 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 6.2 - 9.3 seconds5.4 - 7.6 seconds
Select a car version for a more accurate comparison!

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 9.2 - 15.07.4 - 12.5
Land Rover Range Rover Sport petrol engines consumes on average 3.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than BMW X5. On average, Land Rover Range Rover Sport equipped with diesel engines consume 2.7 litres more fuel per 100 km than the BMW X5.
This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version!
Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy.
Ground clearance: 227 mm (8.9 inches)222 mm (8.7 inches)

Dimensions

Length: 4.79 m4.86 m
Width: 2.12 m1.95 m
Height: 1.81 m1.78 m
Land Rover Range Rover Sport is 7 cm shorter than the BMW X5, 17 cm wider, while the height of Land Rover Range Rover Sport is 3 cm higher.
Trunk capacity: 958 litres620 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down, if possible
2013 litres1750 litres
Land Rover Range Rover Sport has more luggage capacity.
Even though the car is shorter, The BMW X5 may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Land Rover Range Rover Sport (by 263 litres).
Turning diameter: 11.9 meters12.8 meters
The turning circle of the Land Rover Range Rover Sport is 0.9 metres less than that of the BMW X5, which means Land Rover Range Rover Sport can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces.
Gross weight: ~ 3`123 kg~ 2`799 kg
Net weight:~ 2`540 kg~ 2`134 kg
Load capacity:~ 583 kg~ 665 kg
Land Rover Range Rover Sport load capacity (permitted cargo and passenger weight) is par apmēram 14 procentiem less than BMW X5. Therefore, BMW X5 is more suitable for longer family trips or transporting heavier loads.
Safety: no datano data
Quality: no data
average
Average price (€): 860012 200
Pros and Cons: Land Rover Range Rover Sport has
  • roomier boot
  • better manoeuvrability
  • lower price
BMW X5 has
  • lower fuel consumption
  • higher carrying (cargo) capacity
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv