Land Rover Range Rover Sport 2013 vs Jeep Grand Cherokee 2013
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | Rear wheel drive (RWD) / All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
| Land Rover Range Rover Sport is available only with four wheel (4x4) drive, while Jeep Grand Cherokee can be equipped with rear wheel drive and four wheel (4x4) drive. All-wheel drive models tend to consume more fuel, so if you don't need off road capabilities, Jeep Grand Cherokee also offers 2-wheel drive versions for fuel economy. 2WD versions also have lower maintenance costs. | |||
| Engines: | 3.0 - 5.0 | 3.0 - 6.4 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 258 - 550 HP | 247 - 468 HP | |
| Torque: | 450 - 700 NM | 347 - 624 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 4.7 - 7.6 seconds | 5 - 8.3 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.3 - 13.7 | 7.5 - 14.7 | |
|
Land Rover Range Rover Sport petrol engines consumes on average 0.6 litres less fuel per 100 km than Jeep Grand Cherokee. On average, Land Rover Range Rover Sport equipped with diesel engines consume 0.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Jeep Grand Cherokee. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.85 m | 4.83 m | |
| Width: | 2.03 m | 1.95 m | |
| Height: | 1.78 m | 1.77 m | |
|
Land Rover Range Rover Sport is larger. Land Rover Range Rover Sport is 2 cm longer than the Jeep Grand Cherokee, 8 cm wider, while the height of Land Rover Range Rover Sport is 1 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 784 litres | 782 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
no data | 1554 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 12.6 meters | 11.6 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Land Rover Range Rover Sport is 1 metres more than that of the Jeep Grand Cherokee, which means Land Rover Range Rover Sport can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight: | ~ 3`013 kg | ~ 2`948 kg | |
| Net weight: | ~ 2`236 kg | ~ 2`281 kg | |
| Load capacity: | ~ 777 kg | ~ 667 kg | |
| Land Rover Range Rover Sport load capacity (permitted cargo and passenger weight) is par apmēram 14 procentiem more than Jeep Grand Cherokee. Therefore, Land Rover Range Rover Sport is more suitable for longer family trips or transporting heavier loads. | |||
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 20 600 | 23 000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Land Rover Range Rover Sport has
|
Jeep Grand Cherokee has
| |