Land Rover Range Rover Sport 2013 vs Mercedes ML 2011
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 3.0 - 5.0 | 2.1 - 4.7 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 248 - 550 HP | 204 - 408 HP | |
| Torque: | 450 - 700 NM | 370 - 620 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 4.7 - 7.6 seconds | 6.1 - 9 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.3 - 13.7 | 6.0 - 9.3 | |
|
Land Rover Range Rover Sport petrol engines consumes on average 4.4 litres more fuel per 100 km than Mercedes ML. On average, Land Rover Range Rover Sport equipped with diesel engines consume 1.4 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mercedes ML. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.85 m | 4.80 m | |
| Width: | 2.03 m | 1.93 m | |
| Height: | 1.78 m | 1.80 m | |
|
Land Rover Range Rover Sport is larger, but slightly lower. Land Rover Range Rover Sport is 5 cm longer than the Mercedes ML, 10 cm wider, while the height of Land Rover Range Rover Sport is 2 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 784 litres | 690 litres | |
|
Land Rover Range Rover Sport has more luggage capacity. Land Rover Range Rover Sport has 94 litres more trunk space than the Mercedes ML. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 12.6 meters | 11.8 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Land Rover Range Rover Sport is 0.8 metres more than that of the Mercedes ML, which means Land Rover Range Rover Sport can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 2`765 | ~ 2`917 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | above average | |
| Average price (€): | 39 600 | 17 600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Land Rover Range Rover Sport has
|
Mercedes ML has
| |