Land Rover Range Rover Sport 2013 vs BMW X6 2014
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 3.0 - 5.0 | 3.0 - 4.4 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 248 - 550 HP | 249 - 575 HP | |
| Torque: | 450 - 700 NM | 400 - 750 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 4.7 - 7.6 seconds | 4.2 - 6.7 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.3 - 13.7 | 6.0 - 11.1 | |
|
Land Rover Range Rover Sport petrol engines consumes on average 3.5 litres more fuel per 100 km than BMW X6. On average, Land Rover Range Rover Sport equipped with diesel engines consume 1.5 litres more fuel per 100 km than the BMW X6. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.85 m | 4.91 m | |
| Width: | 2.03 m | 1.99 m | |
| Height: | 1.78 m | 1.70 m | |
| Land Rover Range Rover Sport is 6 cm shorter than the BMW X6, 4 cm wider, while the height of Land Rover Range Rover Sport is 8 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 784 litres | 580 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1525 litres | |
|
Land Rover Range Rover Sport has more luggage capacity. Even though the car is shorter, Land Rover Range Rover Sport has 204 litres more trunk space than the BMW X6. The BMW X6 may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 12.6 meters | 12.8 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Land Rover Range Rover Sport is 0.2 metres less than that of the BMW X6. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 2`765 | ~ 2`846 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | below average | |
| Average price (€): | 39 600 | 37 200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Land Rover Range Rover Sport has
|
BMW X6 has
| |