Land Rover Range Rover Sport 2022 vs Volvo XC90 2024
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 3.0 - 4.4 (petrol, diesel, hybrid) | 2.0 (petrol, hybrid) | |
| Both cars are available with petrol and hybrid engines. Land Rover Range Rover Sport is available also with diesel engines. Diesel engines typically offer better fuel efficiency and higher torque compared to other engine types. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 249 - 635 HP | 250 - 310 HP | |
| Torque: | 500 - 800 NM | 360 - 420 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 3.8 - 8 seconds | 5.4 - 7.7 seconds | |
| In general, Land Rover Range Rover Sport are available with more powerful and dynamic engines than Volvo XC90. Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 1.6 - 16.2 | 1.6 - 10.2 | |
|
Land Rover Range Rover Sport petrol engines consumes on average 2.5 litres more fuel per 100 km than Volvo XC90. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
| Ground clearance: | 273 - 281 mm (10.7 - 11.1 inches) | 216 mm (8.5 inches) | |
| Because of the higher ground clearance, Land Rover Range Rover Sport can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.97 m | 4.95 m | |
| Width: | no data | 1.92 m | |
| Height: | 1.81 m | 1.77 m | |
| Trunk capacity: | 647 litres | 302 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
1860 litres | 1856 litres | |
|
Land Rover Range Rover Sport has more luggage capacity. Even though the car is shorter, The Volvo XC90 may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Land Rover Range Rover Sport (by 4 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 12.5 meters | 11.9 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Land Rover Range Rover Sport is 0.6 metres more than that of the Volvo XC90, which means Land Rover Range Rover Sport can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight: | ~ 3`306 kg | ~ 2`843 kg | |
| Net weight: | ~ 2`479 kg | ~ 2`085 kg | |
| Load capacity: | ~ 827 kg | ~ 758 kg | |
| Land Rover Range Rover Sport load capacity (permitted cargo and passenger weight) is par apmēram 8 procentiem more than Volvo XC90. Therefore, Land Rover Range Rover Sport is more suitable for longer family trips or transporting heavier loads. | |||
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | no data | no data | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Land Rover Range Rover Sport has
|
Volvo XC90 has
| |